From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7414 invoked by alias); 22 May 2004 19:13:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7405 invoked from network); 22 May 2004 19:13:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net) (81.228.10.104) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 May 2004 19:13:53 -0000 Received: by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BAB3C37E47; Sat, 22 May 2004 21:13:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.180]) by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A870637E42; Sat, 22 May 2004 21:13:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2299837E46; Sat, 22 May 2004 21:13:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040522190222.79034.qmail@web13124.mail.yahoo.com> References: <1085247439.1485.408.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 19:13:00 -0000 To: Elijah Meeks From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: Wrecking Revisited Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 >I think designers would be better served if the code >simply vanished any disallowed unit without reporting >an error. I can't see much reason for it to work like >it does, but maybe I'm missing something. My recollection is that this is how the wrecking code should work, i.e. wrecks that cannot belong to their assigned side should simply vanish. So you may have found a bug. Or possibly an overzealous run warning. Hans