From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16611 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2004 23:42:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16601 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 23:42:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av8-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) (81.228.8.111) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 23:42:48 -0000 Received: by av8-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B8F5637E62; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.177]) by av8-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EBE37E47; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155]) by smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7FF37E42; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:42:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:48:00 -0000 To: Eric McDonald From: Hans Ronne Subject: Re: The selective fire-at command Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00942.txt.bz2 >out. Also, as you pointed out, the attack command and >corresponding action did work as advertized, and so it cannot be >claimed that those who advocated it were using it under a >delusion in the way that I was using fire under a delusion. Indeed, and as I also stated I can appreciate the potential usefulness of both commands, even if I rarely use them myself. Keeping them is on my revised agenda, and I am even trying to fix the tcltk fire-at command so that it finally will work. Hans