From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xconq7-return-3864-listarch-xconq7=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21379 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2004 08:56:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:xconq7-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/>
List-Post: <mailto:xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xconq7-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21369 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 08:56:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO av15-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net) (81.228.10.101)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 08:56:52 -0000
Received: by av15-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 5387537E46; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181])
	by av15-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 42A9937E42; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [212.181.162.155] (h155n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.155])
	by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA86237E45;
	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:56:51 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: u22611592@m1.226.comhem.se
Message-Id: <l03130304bd40de1cd0ad@[212.181.162.155]>
In-Reply-To: <411ACE32.40605@phy.cmich.edu>
References: <l03130301bd3ffec2487f@[212.181.162.155]>
 <l03130300bd3ff7809353@[212.181.162.155]>
 <l03130301bd3ffec2487f@[212.181.162.155]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:16:00 -0000
To: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
From: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Subject: Re: time.g weirdness
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00879.txt.bz2

>>I think the problems we see now are due to
>> subsequent changes in the command pre-flight code which were in prompted by
>> and in part depended on Peter's code. Some of these changes were kept when
>> the pathfinding was removed.
>>
>> I have just checked out the November 12 sources. My intention is to try to
>> restore command processing as closely as possible to how it worked back
>> then. With no path-finding algorithm, some of these pre-flight checks make
>> little sense.
>
>Well, just for the record, removing the pathfinding code was not an easy
>exercise once things had started to become entangled as they had.

You did a great job with the path-finding rollback. I'm not blaming you for
this bug since it was not easy to anticipate.

Hans