From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: archer@sourceware.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gdbstub initial code, v9
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100914022003.6989A403E6@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kevin Buettner's message of Sunday, 12 September 2010 22:53:50 -0700 <20100912225350.6d5ccc12@mesquite.lan>
> Could someone explain to me why non-stop (rather than all-stop) is
> being focused upon first?
We've tried to encourage Oleg to do whatever is easiest first.
It's not clear to me why all-stop isn't what's easiest, all in all.
> Something else that came to mind while reading this thread is the
> issue of cache synchronization. [...]
> (If the kernel calls that you're using already automagically do this, then
> ignore this comment...)
They do. Not to worry. (It's the same internal path that you get to when
gdb or gdbserver uses a ptrace syscall or a write syscall on /proc/pid/mem.)
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-14 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-08 19:22 Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 10:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 12:39 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-09-09 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-09-09 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 16:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:51 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-10 10:12 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 19:43 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-10 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-13 5:54 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-09-14 2:20 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2010-09-14 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-14 16:30 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-14 21:30 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-15 19:43 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-09-10 22:03 ` ugdb && breakpoints Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 22:12 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-14 19:38 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100914022003.6989A403E6@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=archer@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).