From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: archer@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdbstub initial code, v9
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100915124303.0c4b07e6@mesquite.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100914160700.GA20290@redhat.com>
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:07:00 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> So, in the long term, which mode is more useful?
I don't know about long term, but the most common use case is
currently all-stop. Certainly for the short term, I think it
makes more sense to implement all-stop first. (I think you'll
run into fewer GDB bugs with all-stop...)
> And, I suppose that (unfortunately ;) ugdb should support both ?
It depends upon the goals of the ugdb project.
If the goal is to demonstrate utrace, then support for only one mode
might be sufficient. (I'll let someone else make that determination.)
If the goal is to become a full-fledged debug agent ala gdbserver,
then ugdb will need to support both.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-15 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-08 19:22 Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 10:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 12:39 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-09-09 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-09-09 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 16:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-09 16:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-09 16:51 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-10 10:12 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-10 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 19:43 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-10 19:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-13 5:54 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-09-14 2:20 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-14 16:30 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-09-14 21:30 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-15 19:43 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2010-09-10 22:03 ` ugdb && breakpoints Oleg Nesterov
2010-09-10 22:12 ` Tom Tromey
2010-09-14 19:38 ` Roland McGrath
2010-09-14 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100915124303.0c4b07e6@mesquite.lan \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=archer@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).