From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Project Archer <archer@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to change branch maintenance
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130213121556.GA21353@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nhipla5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:56:18 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> So, new branches would be like "tromey/project" rather than the current
> "archer-tromey-project".
>
> I don't propose renaming existing branches.
IMO if there should be a different naming the existing should be renamed,
otherwise it is more complicated/mess than it was.
> Third, what about adopting a convention for a "README.archer" file in
> the top-level of each branch?
That would not work for merges of multiple branches. Some ARCHER.branchname
would work. But ...
> I think newer git even has some automated thing for documenting
> branches, but unfortunately I think we aren't all on a new-enough git
> yet. We could adopt that when we're ready.
... you probably mean "git branch --edit-description", I do not know it.
It exists even in the oldest supported Fedora (F-17) and in reality archer.git
is not in use outside of RH so I do not see a problem with --edit-description.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 21:56 Tom Tromey
2013-02-13 11:32 ` Gary Benson
2013-02-13 12:16 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2013-02-13 12:33 ` Pedro Alves
2013-02-13 12:53 ` Gary Benson
2013-02-18 16:10 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-18 16:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-18 16:29 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-18 17:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-18 17:40 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-18 22:01 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-22 15:54 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-26 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-26 20:13 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-26 20:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-02-27 20:50 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-27 20:50 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-27 21:15 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-18 11:46 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-02-18 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-18 16:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-22 15:06 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-22 21:27 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130213121556.GA21353@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=archer@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).