* Fwd: Re: BFD for the HP3000
@ 1999-03-30 14:15 Mark Klein
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mark Klein @ 1999-03-30 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
>At 01:44 PM 3/30/99 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>Boy, this sounds like it could get ugly. What sort of calls do you
>>need to generate?
>There is a binary filecode that needs to get added to the filelabel. The
>fopen() call should be replaced with something called HPFopen(). Alternately,
>I could build an fopen() wrapper that in turn calls HPFopen(), but I still
>need to be able to identify which attribute (relocatable, archive or program)
>needs to be applied to the open through an additional parameter.
>>I don't think that will be right. Think about using HP3000 as the
>>host for a cross compiler to some other system.
>Good point. My other choice is to build a new BFD for each type, but that
>get ugly too, since bfd_object can apply to both relocatable objects as
>program objects. At least bfd_archive is separate.
Mark Klein DIS International, Ltd.
PGP Public Key Available
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1999-03-30 14:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-03-30 14:15 Fwd: Re: BFD for the HP3000 Mark Klein
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).