public inbox for binutils-cvs@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] RISC-V: Optimize relaxation of gp with max_alignment.
@ 2023-04-21  7:49 Nelson Chu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nelson Chu @ 2023-04-21  7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bfd-cvs

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0699f2d795cdb4bc4db2bcf438291ec09d21f0da

commit 0699f2d795cdb4bc4db2bcf438291ec09d21f0da
Author: Lifang Xia <lifang_xia@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 27 11:19:15 2022 +0800

    RISC-V: Optimize relaxation of gp with max_alignment.
    
    This should be the first related issue, which posted in riscv-gnu-toolchain,
    https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain/issues/497
    
    If the output sections are not between gp and the symbol, then their alignments
    shouldn't affect the gp relaxation.  However, this patch improves this idea
    even more, it limits the range to the gp+-2k, which means only the output
    section which are in the [gp-2K, gp+2K) range need to be considered.
    
    Even if the output section candidates may be different for each relax passes,
    the symbol that can be relaxed ar this round will not be truncated at next
    round.  That is because this round you can do relaxation which means that the
    section where the symbol is located is within the [gp-2K, gp+2K) range, so all
    the output section alignments between them should be considered.  In other
    words, if the alignments between them may cause truncated, then we should
    already preserve the size and won't do the gp relaxation this time.
    
    This patch can resolve the github issue which mentioned above, and also passed
    all gcc/binutils regressions of riscv-gnu-toolchain, so should be worth and
    safe enough to commit.
    
    Originally, this patch also do the same optimization for the call relaxations,
    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-October/123918.html
    But just in case there is something that has not been considered, we only
    deal with the gp relaxation at this time.
    
    bfd/
            * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_link_hash_table): Added new bfd_vma,
            max_alignment_for_gp.  It is used to record the maximum alignment of
            the output sections, which are in the [gp-2K, gp+2k) range.
            (riscv_elf_link_hash_table_create): Init max_alignment_for_gp to -1.
            (_bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment): Added new parameter, gp.  If gp is
            zero, then all the output section alignments are possible candidates;
            Otherwise, only the output sections which are in the [gp-2K, gp+2K)
            range need to be considered.
            (_bfd_riscv_relax_lui): Called _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment with the
            non-zero gp if the max_alignment_for_gp is -1.
            (_bfd_riscv_relax_pc): Likewise.
            (_bfd_riscv_relax_section): Record the first input section, so that
            we can reset the max_alignment_for_gp for each repeated relax passes.
    ld/
            * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Updated.
            * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.*: New testcase.  It fails
            without this patch.

Diff:
---
 bfd/elfnn-riscv.c                              | 103 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp     |   1 +
 ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.d |  46 +++++++++++
 ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.s |  28 +++++++
 4 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
index 0dd9b27c8ae..e90e36b58bb 100644
--- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
+++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
@@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ struct riscv_elf_link_hash_table
   /* The max alignment of output sections.  */
   bfd_vma max_alignment;
 
+  /* The max alignment of output sections in [gp-2K, gp+2K) range.  */
+  bfd_vma max_alignment_for_gp;
+
   /* Used by local STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols.  */
   htab_t loc_hash_table;
   void * loc_hash_memory;
@@ -488,6 +491,7 @@ riscv_elf_link_hash_table_create (bfd *abfd)
     }
 
   ret->max_alignment = (bfd_vma) -1;
+  ret->max_alignment_for_gp = (bfd_vma) -1;
 
   /* Create hash table for local ifunc.  */
   ret->loc_hash_table = htab_try_create (1024,
@@ -4460,17 +4464,27 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_call (bfd *abfd, asection *sec, asection *sym_sec,
 				   link_info, pcgp_relocs, rel + 1);
 }
 
-/* Traverse all output sections and return the max alignment.  */
+/* Traverse all output sections and return the max alignment.
+
+   If gp is zero, then all the output section alignments are
+   possible candidates;  Otherwise, only the output sections
+   which are in the [gp-2K, gp+2K) range need to be considered.  */
 
 static bfd_vma
-_bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (asection *sec)
+_bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (asection *sec, bfd_vma gp)
 {
   unsigned int max_alignment_power = 0;
   asection *o;
 
   for (o = sec->output_section->owner->sections; o != NULL; o = o->next)
     {
-      if (o->alignment_power > max_alignment_power)
+      bool valid = true;
+      if (gp
+	  && !(VALID_ITYPE_IMM (sec_addr (o) - gp)
+	       || VALID_ITYPE_IMM (sec_addr (o) + o->size - gp)))
+	valid = false;
+
+      if (valid && o->alignment_power > max_alignment_power)
 	max_alignment_power = o->alignment_power;
     }
 
@@ -4492,15 +4506,16 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_lui (bfd *abfd,
 		      riscv_pcgp_relocs *pcgp_relocs,
 		      bool undefined_weak)
 {
+  struct riscv_elf_link_hash_table *htab = riscv_elf_hash_table (link_info);
   bfd_byte *contents = elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents;
-  bfd_vma gp = riscv_elf_hash_table (link_info)->params->relax_gp
-		   ? riscv_global_pointer_value (link_info)
-		   : 0;
+  bfd_vma gp = htab->params->relax_gp
+	       ? riscv_global_pointer_value (link_info)
+	       : 0;
   int use_rvc = elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_flags & EF_RISCV_RVC;
 
   BFD_ASSERT (rel->r_offset + 4 <= sec->size);
 
-  if (gp)
+  if (!undefined_weak && gp)
     {
       /* If gp and the symbol are in the same output section, which is not the
 	 abs section, then consider only that output section's alignment.  */
@@ -4510,16 +4525,28 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_lui (bfd *abfd,
       if (h->u.def.section->output_section == sym_sec->output_section
 	  && sym_sec->output_section != bfd_abs_section_ptr)
 	max_alignment = (bfd_vma) 1 << sym_sec->output_section->alignment_power;
+      else
+	{
+	  /* Consider output section alignments which are in [gp-2K, gp+2K). */
+	  max_alignment = htab->max_alignment_for_gp;
+	  if (max_alignment == (bfd_vma) -1)
+	    {
+	      max_alignment = _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (sec, gp);
+	      htab->max_alignment_for_gp = max_alignment;
+	    }
+	}
     }
 
   /* Is the reference in range of x0 or gp?
-     Valid gp range conservatively because of alignment issue.  */
+     Valid gp range conservatively because of alignment issue.
+
+     Should we also consider the alignment issue for x0 base?  */
   if (undefined_weak
-      || (VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval)
-	  || (symval >= gp
-	      && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp + max_alignment + reserve_size))
-	  || (symval < gp
-	      && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp - max_alignment - reserve_size))))
+      || VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval)
+      || (symval >= gp
+	  && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp + max_alignment + reserve_size))
+      || (symval < gp
+	  && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp - max_alignment - reserve_size)))
     {
       unsigned sym = ELFNN_R_SYM (rel->r_info);
       switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
@@ -4709,6 +4736,7 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_pc (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 		     riscv_pcgp_relocs *pcgp_relocs,
 		     bool undefined_weak)
 {
+  struct riscv_elf_link_hash_table *htab = riscv_elf_hash_table (link_info);
   bfd_byte *contents = elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents;
   bfd_vma gp = riscv_global_pointer_value (link_info);
 
@@ -4765,7 +4793,7 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_pc (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
       abort ();
     }
 
-  if (gp)
+  if (!undefined_weak && gp)
     {
       /* If gp and the symbol are in the same output section, which is not the
 	 abs section, then consider only that output section's alignment.  */
@@ -4775,16 +4803,28 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_pc (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
       if (h->u.def.section->output_section == sym_sec->output_section
 	  && sym_sec->output_section != bfd_abs_section_ptr)
 	max_alignment = (bfd_vma) 1 << sym_sec->output_section->alignment_power;
+      else
+	{
+	  /* Consider output section alignments which are in [gp-2K, gp+2K). */
+	  max_alignment = htab->max_alignment_for_gp;
+	  if (max_alignment == (bfd_vma) -1)
+	    {
+	      max_alignment = _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (sec, gp);
+	      htab->max_alignment_for_gp = max_alignment;
+	    }
+	}
     }
 
   /* Is the reference in range of x0 or gp?
-     Valid gp range conservatively because of alignment issue.  */
+     Valid gp range conservatively because of alignment issue.
+
+     Should we also consider the alignment issue for x0 base?  */
   if (undefined_weak
-      || (VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval)
-	  || (symval >= gp
-	      && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp + max_alignment + reserve_size))
-	  || (symval < gp
-	      && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp - max_alignment - reserve_size))))
+      || VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval)
+      || (symval >= gp
+	  && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp + max_alignment + reserve_size))
+      || (symval < gp
+	  && VALID_ITYPE_IMM (symval - gp - max_alignment - reserve_size)))
     {
       unsigned sym = hi_reloc.hi_sym;
       switch (ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info))
@@ -4877,6 +4917,7 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_section (bfd *abfd, asection *sec,
   unsigned int i;
   bfd_vma max_alignment, reserve_size = 0;
   riscv_pcgp_relocs pcgp_relocs;
+  static asection *first_section = NULL;
 
   *again = false;
 
@@ -4892,6 +4933,13 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_section (bfd *abfd, asection *sec,
       || *(htab->data_segment_phase) == 4)
     return true;
 
+  /* Record the first relax section, so that we can reset the
+     max_alignment_for_gp for the repeated relax passes.  */
+  if (first_section == NULL)
+    first_section = sec;
+  else if (first_section == sec)
+    htab->max_alignment_for_gp = -1;
+
   riscv_init_pcgp_relocs (&pcgp_relocs);
 
   /* Read this BFD's relocs if we haven't done so already.  */
@@ -4901,17 +4949,14 @@ _bfd_riscv_relax_section (bfd *abfd, asection *sec,
 						 info->keep_memory)))
     goto fail;
 
-  if (htab)
+  /* Estimate the maximum alignment for all output sections once time
+     should be enough.  */
+  max_alignment = htab->max_alignment;
+  if (max_alignment == (bfd_vma) -1)
     {
-      max_alignment = htab->max_alignment;
-      if (max_alignment == (bfd_vma) -1)
-	{
-	  max_alignment = _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (sec);
-	  htab->max_alignment = max_alignment;
-	}
+      max_alignment = _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (sec, 0/* gp */);
+      htab->max_alignment = max_alignment;
     }
-  else
-    max_alignment = _bfd_riscv_get_max_alignment (sec);
 
   /* Examine and consider relaxing each reloc.  */
   for (i = 0; i < sec->reloc_count; i++)
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp
index 43572c5286b..9e103b283f7 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ if [istarget "riscv*-*-*"] {
     run_dump_test "attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-05"
     run_dump_test "attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-06"
     run_dump_test "attr-phdr"
+    run_dump_test "relax-max-align-gp"
     run_ld_link_tests [list \
 	[list "Weak reference 32" "-T weakref.ld -m[riscv_choose_ilp32_emul]" "" \
 	    "-march=rv32i -mabi=ilp32" {weakref32.s} \
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.d
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..637de426ee4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.d
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#source: relax-max-align-gp.s
+#ld:
+#objdump: -d
+
+.*:[ 	]+file format .*
+
+
+Disassembly of section .text:
+
+0+[0-9a-f]+ <_start>:
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+add[ 	]+.*<gdata>
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+jal[ 	]+.*
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+j[ 	]+.*
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+nop
+
+0+[0-9a-f]+ <func>:
+.*:[ 	]+[0-9a-f]+[ 	]+ret
+[ 	]+...
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.s b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ce3da21e7f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/relax-max-align-gp.s
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+
+.global _start
+_start:
+	lui   a0, %hi(gdata)
+	addi  a0, a0, %lo(gdata)
+	call func
+	j .
+	.size _start, . - _start
+
+.global func
+.align 7
+func:
+	ret
+	.size func, . - func
+
+.data
+padding:
+	.long 0
+	.long 0
+	.long 0
+	.long 0
+	.size padding, . - padding
+
+.global gdata
+.type gdata, object
+gdata:
+	.zero 4
+	.size gdata, . - gdata

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-04-21  7:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-21  7:49 [binutils-gdb] RISC-V: Optimize relaxation of gp with max_alignment Nelson Chu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).