public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Andreas K. Hüttel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
Cc: toolchain@gentoo.org, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, needs more eyes] Relink also libopcodes and libgprofng to newly built libiberty.a
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:29:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0598a25f-8610-25e3-45ae-dc0e77852761@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230228224937.3832887-1-dilfridge@gentoo.org>

On 28.02.2023 23:49, Andreas K. Hüttel via Binutils wrote:
> For Gentoo users, after updating gcc, a subsequent build of
> binutils can fail during "make install" with the following symptoms:
> 
> lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file '/usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.37_p1/libiberty.a' generated with LTO version 11.0 instead of the expected 11.2
> compilation terminated.
> 
> The relink command picks up the installed version of libiberty.a
> instead of the just built one. This commit addresses the issue by
> replicating the workaround made in 7d53105d for libctf also for
> libopcodes and libgprofng.
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834720
> Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>

Looks largely okay to me, but please add comments along the lines of the
one found in libctf/Makefile.am.

I'm not going to ask ...

> ---
>  gprofng/src/Makefile.am | 3 ++-
>  gprofng/src/Makefile.in | 3 ++-
>  opcodes/configure       | 4 ++--
>  opcodes/configure.ac    | 4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

... why libopcodes handles this in configure rather than in Makefile, as
that's a pre-existing (apparent) oddity.

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-01  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-28 22:49 Andreas K. Hüttel
2023-03-01  8:29 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2023-03-01 22:17 ` Vladimir Mezentsev
2023-03-02  5:11   ` Alan Modra
2023-03-02  8:10     ` Vladimir Mezentsev
2023-03-02  9:27       ` Alan Modra
2023-03-15 20:51 ` Andreas K. Huettel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0598a25f-8610-25e3-45ae-dc0e77852761@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=toolchain@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).