Test suite results for mips-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

Test suite results for mips-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

[Martin Michlmayr]

Test Run By tbm on Wed May 17 20:54:24 2006
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu

		=== binutils tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

		=== binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes		35

		=== gas tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

		=== gas Summary ===

# of expected passes		581
# of expected failures		1

		=== ld tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

FAIL: vers24a [?]
FAIL: vers24b [?]
FAIL: vers24c [?]
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) [see below]
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) [*]
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) [*]
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main) [*]
FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) [*]
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) [*]
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main) [*]
FAIL: MIPS textrel-1 [see below]
FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3 [*]

		=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes		281
# of unexpected failures	15
# of expected failures		20
# of unsupported tests		1

[*] Thiemo pointed out to me that these fail with a segfault or a bus
error and that he cannot reproduce them when running the tests by hand.
He'll test on other hardware later.

[?] I cannot see an error message.

Errors:

gcc -B/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/usr/local/mips-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib  -o tmpdir/vnp.so -shared  tmpdir/sh1np.o tmpdir/sh2np.o
tmpdir/sh1np.o: In function `visibility_checkfunptr':
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/sh1.c:216: undefined reference to `visibility'
tmpdir/sh1np.o: In function `visibility_check':
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/sh1.c:232: undefined reference to `visibility'
...
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: tmpdir/vnp.so: hidden symbol `visibility_var' isn't defined
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gcc -B/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/usr/local/mips-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib  -o tmpdir/vnp.so -shared -T /home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elf-offset.ld tmpdir/sh1np.o tmpdir/sh2np.o
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: tmpdir/vnp.so: The first section in the PT_DYNAMIC segment is not the .dynamic section
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset)

gcc -B/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/usr/local/mips-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/
local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib  -o tmpdir/vp.so -shared  tmpdir/sh1p.o tmpdir/sh2p.o
tmpdir/sh1p.o: In function `visibility_checkfunptr':
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/sh1.c:216: undefined reference to `visibilit
y'
...
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: tmpdir/vp.so: hidden symbol `visibility_var' isn't
 defined
/home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/tmpdir/ld/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on out
put
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Running /home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp ...
failed with: <tmpdir/dump0.o: In function `start':
(.text+0x10): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_26 against `start'>, expected: <.*relocation truncated to fit.*>
FAIL: MIPS textrel-1

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: Test suite results for mips-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

[Thiemo Seufer]

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Test Run By tbm on Wed May 17 20:54:24 2006
> Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
> 
> 		=== binutils tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> 		=== binutils Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		35
> 
> 		=== gas tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> 		=== gas Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		581
> # of expected failures		1
> 
> 		=== ld tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> FAIL: vers24a [?]
> FAIL: vers24b [?]
> FAIL: vers24c [?]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) [see below]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main) [*]
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1 [see below]
> FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3 [*]
> 
> 		=== ld Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		281
> # of unexpected failures	15
> # of expected failures		20
> # of unsupported tests		1
> 
> [*] Thiemo pointed out to me that these fail with a segfault or a bus
> error and that he cannot reproduce them when running the tests by hand.
> He'll test on other hardware later.

SIGILL, actually.

> [?] I cannot see an error message.

The expected relocation entry isn't there.

[snip]
> Running /home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp ...
> failed with: <tmpdir/dump0.o: In function `start':
> (.text+0x10): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_26 against `start'>, expected: <.*relocation truncated to fit.*>
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1

I don't see the last one, textrel-1 creates a TEXTREL section here but
shouldn't.


Thiemo

Re: Test suite results for mips-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> [2006-05-17 23:13]:
> I don't see the last one, textrel-1 creates a TEXTREL section here but
> shouldn't.

Right, my bad.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/