From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] binutils: Handle DWARF5 DW_FORM_ref_addr and DW_UT_partial.
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:55:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924205500.GB5317@wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31edd139-9e1f-3cd0-b413-b0489bdd0616@redhat.com>
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:23:49AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > binutils/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * dwarf.c (read_and_display_attr_value): Handle DW_FORM_ref_addr
> > for dwarf_version 5 just as version 3 and 4 (only 2 is different).
> > (process_debug_info): Allow DW_UT_partial.
>
> Approved - please apply - I do however have one small suggested change:
>
> > - else if (dwarf_version == 3 || dwarf_version == 4)
> > + else if (dwarf_version == 3 || dwarf_version == 4 || dwarf_version == 5)
> > SAFE_BYTE_GET_AND_INC (uvalue, data, offset_size, end);
> > else
> > - error (_("Internal error: DWARF version is not 2, 3 or 4.\n"));
> > + error (_("Internal error: DWARF version is not 2, 3, 4 or 5.\n"));
>
> I think that it is safe to say that say that DW_FORM_ref_addr is not going
> to change in future versions of the DWARF spec, so it would be easier/simpler
> to change the check to be "dwarf_version > 2" and the error message to be
> "DW_FORM_ref_addr is not supported in DWARF version 1".
Makes sense. Pushed with that change.
Cheers,
Mark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 14:51 Mark Wielaard
2020-09-23 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] Sync libiberty and include with GCC for get_DW_UT_name Mark Wielaard
2020-09-24 10:26 ` Nick Clifton
2020-09-24 21:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-25 2:23 ` Alan Modra
2020-09-25 9:38 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-09-23 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] readelf: Show Unit Type for DWARF5 Mark Wielaard
2020-09-24 10:27 ` Nick Clifton
2020-09-24 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] binutils: Handle DWARF5 DW_FORM_ref_addr and DW_UT_partial Nick Clifton
2020-09-24 20:55 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200924205500.GB5317@wildebeest.org \
--to=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).