public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ld: Allow R_X86_64_GOTPCREL for call *__tls_get_addr@GOTPCREL(%rip)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:10:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302201029.vflqmyjxh7qnyxa3@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c693059-fcc0-0874-68be-47bbfef47260@suse.com>

On 2023-03-02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 05.01.2023 22:05, Fangrui Song via Binutils wrote:
>> _Thread_local int a;
>> int main() { return a; }
>>
>> % gcc -fno-plt -fpic a.c -fuse-ld=bfd -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no
>> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: /tmp/ccSSBgrg.o: TLS transition from R_X86_64_TLSGD to R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF against `a' at 0xd in section `.text' failed
>> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>
>> This commit fixes the issue.
>
>The discussion with H.J. looks to have died out, without a clear result.
>May I suggest the following (also for the other, 32-bit patch): You
>extend the description to address H.J.'s concerns verbally, and unless
>he comes forward pointing actual flaws in here, I'd then intend to
>approve the changes.
>
>Jan
>
>>     PR ld/24784
>>     * bfd/elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition): Allow
>>       R_X86_64_GOTPCREL.
>> ---
>>  bfd/elf64-x86-64.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
>> index 914f82d0151..095fe2e0fe6 100644
>> --- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
>> +++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
>> @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition (bfd *abfd,
>>  	  if (largepic)
>>  	    return r_type == R_X86_64_PLTOFF64;
>>  	  else if (indirect_call)
>> -	    return r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX;
>> +	    return (r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX || r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCREL);
>>  	  else
>>  	    return (r_type == R_X86_64_PC32 || r_type == R_X86_64_PLT32);
>>  	}
>

Thank you!  Here is PATCH v2 with an updated description but no code
change:


 From a8df373aec097dcdabe46717dd95cdd9b16ef7d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 12:45:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] ld: Allow R_X86_64_GOTPCREL for call
  *__tls_get_addr@GOTPCREL(%rip)

_Thread_local int a;
int main() { return a; }

% gcc -fno-plt -fpic a.c -fuse-ld=bfd -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: /tmp/ccSSBgrg.o: TLS transition from R_X86_64_TLSGD to R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF against `a' at 0xd in section `.text' failed
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

This commit fixes the issue.

There is an argument that the -fno-plt TLS sequence was added after
R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX was required for call, so R_X86_64_GOTPCREL was
intended to be unsupported.

Unfortunately this standpoint has caused interop difficulty: some
projects specify -mrelax-relocations=no to build relocatable object
files compatible with older linkers (e.g.
https://github.com/IHaskell/IHaskell/issues/636) or do so by accident
(e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106511 not addressed as of
today).  Many uses have not been cleaned up in practice, and compiling
with -fno-plt will lead to the `TLS transition from R_X86_64_TLSGD ...`
error which is hard to reason about.

There is another argument which may be weaker but relevant to the
necessity of -mrelax-relocations=no: HWAddressSanitizer x86-64 will
likely need some assembler support to disable relaxation.  Without the
support and if the compiler needs to support many gas versions, the
simplest solutation would be to use -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no.

     PR ld/24784
     * bfd/elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition): Allow
       R_X86_64_GOTPCREL.
---
  bfd/elf64-x86-64.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
index 0aa9af5d8fc..dd987ee011b 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
@@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition (bfd *abfd,
  	  if (largepic)
  	    return r_type == R_X86_64_PLTOFF64;
  	  else if (indirect_call)
-	    return r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX;
+	    return (r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX || r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCREL);
  	  else
  	    return (r_type == R_X86_64_PC32 || r_type == R_X86_64_PLT32);
  	}
-- 
2.40.0.rc0.216.gc4246ad0f0-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-05 21:05 [PATCH] " Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 17:03 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 18:48   ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 21:13     ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 21:25       ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 21:26         ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 21:44           ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 22:41             ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 23:02               ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 23:20                 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 23:52                   ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-07  0:01                     ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-09  8:15   ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-09 21:14     ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-10  9:16       ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-10 20:39         ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-10 21:02           ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-11  9:01             ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-11  8:10           ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 11:37 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 20:10   ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2023-03-10  9:10     ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230302201029.vflqmyjxh7qnyxa3@google.com \
    --to=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).