From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld: Allow R_X86_64_GOTPCREL for call *__tls_get_addr@GOTPCREL(%rip)
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:48:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFP8O3JLnptrq5h=rwdQPP+OLGLhfYnE6Nx13vZLRrLBUKhmHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOo-x+d5ZZtSk7rA76HpoJGuZ0JLNAqNGfM2rRVExjZjHw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 9:04 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:06 PM Fangrui Song via Binutils
> <binutils@sourceware.org> wrote:
> >
> > _Thread_local int a;
> > int main() { return a; }
> >
> > % gcc -fno-plt -fpic a.c -fuse-ld=bfd -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no
> > /usr/bin/ld.bfd: /tmp/ccSSBgrg.o: TLS transition from R_X86_64_TLSGD to R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF against `a' at 0xd in section `.text' failed
> > /usr/bin/ld.bfd: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > This commit fixes the issue.
> >
> > PR ld/24784
> > * bfd/elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition): Allow
> > R_X86_64_GOTPCREL.
> > ---
> > bfd/elf64-x86-64.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
> > index 914f82d0151..095fe2e0fe6 100644
> > --- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
> > +++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
> > @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition (bfd *abfd,
> > if (largepic)
> > return r_type == R_X86_64_PLTOFF64;
> > else if (indirect_call)
> > - return r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX;
> > + return (r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX || r_type == R_X86_64_GOTPCREL);
> > else
> > return (r_type == R_X86_64_PC32 || r_type == R_X86_64_PLT32);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
> >
>
> Since the new TLS sequence was added after R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX was
> required for call, R_X86_64_GOTPCREL should be invalid in this TLS sequence.
>
> --
> H.J.
I have multiple arguments (albeit no single one is very strong) that
this 1-deletion-1-addition change provides benefits for users (IMHO
with no burden to binutils at all).
Some projects may add -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no to work around older
GNU ld. Then the project's toolchain requirement may increase and no
longer need to work around older GNU ld.
But a distribution may for some reason use a global -fno-plt (e.g.
Arch Linux) and then run into this TLS GD/LD->IE/LE optimization
issue.
rust src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/*musl/Dockerfile
openjdk/jdk19u make/autoconf/flags-cflags.m4 (this file appears to be
copied into quite a few projects)
Linux kernel arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile (not a good example as
it doesn't use TLS AFAICT)
R_X86_64_GOTPCREL isn't purely usefull. It may help linker design: for
R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX/R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX, the linker can make a
decision upfront whether a GOT entry is needed
(this affects the size of .got, which may affect section layout and
whether other relocations may overflow).
This may increase risk of 32-bit relocation overflow.
R_X86_64_GOTPCREL can mitigate the risk while being aware to the user.
rustc somehow disables x86 relaxed relocations and defaults to `-Z
plt=no` and now relies on llvm-project to work around the GNU ld
compatibility issue.
--
宋方睿
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-05 21:05 Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 17:03 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 18:48 ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2023-01-06 21:13 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 21:25 ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 21:26 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 21:44 ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 22:41 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 23:02 ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-06 23:20 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-06 23:52 ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-07 0:01 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-09 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-09 21:14 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-10 9:16 ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-10 20:39 ` H.J. Lu
2023-01-10 21:02 ` Fangrui Song
2023-01-11 9:01 ` Jan Beulich
2023-01-11 8:10 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 11:37 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-02 20:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Fangrui Song
2023-03-10 9:10 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFP8O3JLnptrq5h=rwdQPP+OLGLhfYnE6Nx13vZLRrLBUKhmHw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=maskray@google.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).