public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Jiang, Haochen" <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: support AVX10.1/512
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 10:04:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27b594ab-6380-d92e-9fb4-148a48366664@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB594697F065AC5C65A256135DECE8A@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 05.09.2023 10:00, Jiang, Haochen wrote:
>> ---
>> TBD: What about (VEX-encoded) FMA, F16C, AVX-VNNI, AVX-IFMA? Should we
>>      make those prereqs as well, along with the various AVX512* ones?
>>      (If so, the latter two would want VEX encodings generally preferred
>>      over EVEX ones when AVX10.1 is explicitly enabled, unless Disp8
>>      scaling helps shortening the resulting encoding.)
> 
> Forgot to mention in previous thread, AVX-IFMA should not be implied for AVX10.1
> because it will not be present in Granite Rapids.

Despite AVX512-IFMA being covered by AVX10? Very odd.

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-05  7:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: AVX10.1 (alternative attempt) Jan Beulich
2023-09-05  7:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86: make AES/PCMULQDQ respectively prereqs of VAES/VPCMULQDQ Jan Beulich
2023-09-05  7:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: support AVX10.1/512 Jan Beulich
2023-09-05  8:00   ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-09-05  8:04     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2023-09-05  8:13       ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-09-05  7:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86: support AVX10.1 vector size restrictions Jan Beulich
2023-09-05  8:11   ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-09-05  8:40     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27b594ab-6380-d92e-9fb4-148a48366664@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=haochen.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).