From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Nick Clifton via Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Should we have a 2.35.1 point release ?
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:11:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87363j73k7.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2eb8cd4e-45d6-01e0-96c3-9bf4a7098c51@redhat.com> (Nick Clifton via Binutils's message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:57:26 +0100")
> Hi Guys,
>
> With all the recent fixes that have gone in to the 2.35 branch, I
> was wondering whether it would be a reasonable to have a 2.35.1
> point release.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> If we are agreed then I would probably carve it out over this weekend
> (Sep 19/20).
+1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 9:57 Nick Clifton
2020-09-15 10:11 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87363j73k7.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).