Ping: [PATCH v2 2/7] x86: improve match_template()'s diagnostics

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>]

On 26.08.2022 12:30, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
> At the example of
> 
> 	extractps $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
> 	insertps $0, %xmm0, %eax
> 
> (both having respectively the same mistake of using the wrong kind of
> destination register) it is easy to see that current behavior is far
> from ideal: The former results in "unsupported instruction" for 32-bit
> code simply because the 2nd template we have is a Cpu64 one. Instead we
> should aim at emitting the "best" possible error, which will typically
> be the one where we passed the largest number of checks. Generalize the
> original "specific_error" approach by making it apply to the entire
> matching loop, utilizing that line numbers increase as we pass further
> checks.
> ---
> v2: Style correction.

Like for patch 1 - since you did comment on v1, may I ask for explicit
feedback? Otherwise again: If I don't hear back by the end of next week,
I guess I'll commit this change.

Jan