From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] x86: drop L1OM/K1OM from gas plus associated tidying
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:42:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93cecdf2-b805-4508-9e34-89fd0011ccc9@suse.com> (raw)
It was the bugs / shortcomings dealt with here as a "side effect"
which made me raise the question of the utility of having the
rudimentary support for the two sub-architectures. Oddly enough
some of the bugs need fixing _before_ removing the support, or else
IAMCU would regress. Furthermore a new IAMCU test can be put in
place only _after_ removing the support.
1: assorted IAMCU CPU checking fixes
2: drop L1OM/K1OM support from gas
3: add another IAMCU testcase
4: unify CPU flag on/off processing
5: never set i386_cpu_flags' "unused" field
6: don't accept base architectures as extensions
Jan
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-16 8:42 Jan Beulich [this message]
2022-03-16 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: assorted IAMCU CPU checking fixes Jan Beulich
2022-03-16 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: drop L1OM/K1OM support from gas Jan Beulich
2022-03-16 8:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: add another IAMCU testcase Jan Beulich
2022-05-18 17:46 ` H.J. Lu
2022-03-16 8:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: unify CPU flag on/off processing Jan Beulich
2022-03-16 8:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: never set i386_cpu_flags' "unused" field Jan Beulich
2022-03-16 8:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: don't accept base architectures as extensions Jan Beulich
2022-03-16 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86: drop L1OM/K1OM from gas plus associated tidying H.J. Lu
2022-03-17 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2022-03-17 15:11 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93cecdf2-b805-4508-9e34-89fd0011ccc9@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).