From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove libopcodes dependency
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:38:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOp_Wv3xU=Qv_DZBEY1mrr5VJtusxbs7i0k0nNefYYOxOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac922986-8083-c813-1bfc-cd5c5372301e@suse.com>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 1:22 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 29.11.2022 00:49, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:19 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >> On 22.11.2022 19:19, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> --- a/gas/Makefile.am
> >>> +++ b/gas/Makefile.am
> >>> @@ -446,6 +446,12 @@ development.exp: $(BFDDIR)/development.sh
> >>> $(EGREP) "(development|experimental)=" $(BFDDIR)/development.sh \
> >>> | $(AWK) -F= '{ print "set " $$1 " " $$2 }' > $@
> >>>
> >>> +$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-init.h $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-tbl.h: \
> >>> + @MAINT@ $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.tbl \
> >>> + $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-reg.tbl \
> >>> + $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.h
> >>> + cd ../opcodes; make gen-i386-tbl
> >>
> >> I've made a patch to gas/Makefile.am as you have requested in reply to
> >> my series. I will want to put that through some more testing, so I will
> >> submit a v3 of that only a little later (and of course only unless you
> >> submit a v2 of your patch earlier that I would also end up being okay
> >> with). In the course of doing so I noticed a few more issues with your
> >> change:
> >>
> >> For one I don't think you can put @MAINT@ on a continued line, as the
> >> line continuation might then be hidden when @MAINT@ expands to #. The
> >> list of dependencies wants expressing via a variable, which would then
> >> be used immediately after @MAINT@ without any line continuation
> >> following.
> >
> > Fixed.
>
> No, the same problem is still there. You either need to use a very long
> line, or you need to introduce a variable holding the list of prereqs,
> like I've done in my series.
I got
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-init.h $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-tbl.h:
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.tbl \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-reg.tbl \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.h \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-gen.c
$(MAKE) -C ../opcodes gen-i386-tbl
and
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-init.h $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-tbl.h: #
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.tbl \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-reg.tbl \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.h \
$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-gen.c
$(MAKE) -C ../opcodes gen-i386-tbl
I didn't run into any problems.
> >> And then your rule / dependency won't be enough on a "maintainer-clean"
> >> tree, i.e. when the generated headers aren't there at all, and when
> >> config/.deps/tc-i386.Po is still empty. In that case nothing would
> >> trigger their generation; an explicit dependency of config/tc-i386.o on
> >> these headers needs adding here.
> >
> > Fixed.
> >
> >> Finally you're missing a dependency of the generated headers on
> >> i386-gen.c.
> >
> > They have a dependency on i386-gen which depends on i386-gen.c.
>
> In opcodes/, yes, but talk was about the rule in gas/. Yet despite
> your comment above I see that you've added the missing dependency.
>
> > Here is the v2 patch.
>
> As said in reply to v1 - my objection to this particular use of make
> recursion remains.
The gen-i386-tbl rule doesn't touch any files used by libopcodes.
> I also continue to be irritated by you specifically having asked me
> to further split my series, when you do everything in a single patch.
My patch is relatively small and it does only one thing.
> One further request at least for consideration: In my v3 I've moved
> the inclusion of opcodes/i386-tbl.h quite a bit further down in
> tc-i386.c, as I think it's preferable that way (not introducing the
> static arrays earlier than necessary).
Does it make any differences?
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 18:19 [PATCH] " H.J. Lu
2022-11-23 8:36 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-28 23:43 ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-29 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-24 10:19 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-28 23:49 ` [PATCH v2] " H.J. Lu
2022-11-29 9:22 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-29 19:38 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2022-11-30 0:06 ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-30 6:58 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-30 22:22 ` H.J. Lu
2022-12-01 7:41 ` Jan Beulich
2022-12-01 18:26 ` [PATCH v3] " H.J. Lu
2022-12-02 7:16 ` Jan Beulich
2022-12-02 17:19 ` H.J. Lu
2022-12-05 11:25 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-30 7:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich
2022-11-30 22:15 ` H.J. Lu
2022-12-01 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2022-12-01 18:20 ` H.J. Lu
2022-12-02 7:10 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMe9rOp_Wv3xU=Qv_DZBEY1mrr5VJtusxbs7i0k0nNefYYOxOA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).