From: "徐持恒 Xu Chiheng" <chiheng.xu@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binutils: partially revert 17c6c3b99156fe82c1e637e1a5fd9f163ac788c8
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:21:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPOVtOu+3sOOCo6LJq8NZA9WYGhCp-ff=7b6V4xGM_cUwm1cBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d249f4be-8a2f-7b52-9cc3-46bba829a899@suse.com>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:02 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> So how did you conclude start32.cpp.o uses RELA relocations? .rel.text
> is SHT_REL, not SHT_RELA, and so are other .rel.* sections. Which
> actually supports my suspicion that SHT_REL aren't correctly handled
> when linking, perhaps first and foremost because the x86-64 ABI
> specifies that only RELA relocations are to be used. Whether, in that
> light, it is valid for objcopy to produce SHT_REL output without any
> warning is another question.
>
I'm not an expert, that was all my guess.
It is clear now that x86-64 linker treats the REL relocation entries
as RELA relocation entries, when doing relocation, it does not count
the addend in section content, because src_mask is set to 0.
Then can objcopy transform the REL relocation entries to RELA
relocation entries, so the x86-64 linker can consume them correctly ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 17:44 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-17 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <SY4P282MB40478D0B56A396B9DF249BBE8A069@SY4P282MB4047.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2022-11-17 18:50 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <SY4P282MB40470E7AC17968C86A8731488A069@SY4P282MB4047.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2022-11-17 19:11 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <SY4P282MB40478BD7C68830B7DC5705358A069@SY4P282MB4047.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2022-11-17 19:51 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <SY4P282MB404738CCE8DD452A63DA4B0B8A069@SY4P282MB4047.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2022-11-18 9:37 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-18 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-18 10:24 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-18 10:34 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-18 10:45 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-18 13:31 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <CAPOVtOuQ3Xto+uoRVqfyWDuvqO=8XrL64+ujZHY+OsN81Q4E=A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-18 14:03 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <da40ede4-5f91-a35e-dcae-ab222f0d0cdf@suse.com>
[not found] ` <CAPOVtOsHOzBxx=1bCMgRP-DfWzJu_eS-5UaEj-q_F8p86R-q9g@mail.gmail.com>
2022-11-18 14:09 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-18 14:14 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-18 14:35 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-21 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 8:30 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-21 8:50 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
2022-11-21 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 9:21 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng [this message]
2022-11-21 9:52 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 10:59 ` 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPOVtOu+3sOOCo6LJq8NZA9WYGhCp-ff=7b6V4xGM_cUwm1cBg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chiheng.xu@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).