* ldscripts/empty-address vs. xcoff
@ 2023-07-28 4:41 Alan Modra
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2023-07-28 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
The empty-address tests check that if a section is removed by ld due
to being empty then properties of that section don't affect following
addresses. The xcoff backend doesn't remove the empty .data section
created by empty-address-2* and empty-address-3* for some reason, and
therefore fails the test.
* testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-1.d: Accept more symbols.
* testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2a.d: xfail for xcoff.
* testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2b.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d: Likewise.
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-1.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-1.d
index dbaf778024e..210b70f7097 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-1.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-1.d
@@ -5,5 +5,6 @@
0+0 [AT] _start
#...
0+200 [ADT] __data_end
+#...
0+200 [ADT] __data_start
#pass
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2a.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2a.d
index 4471a1be6a3..a619ea19a07 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2a.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2a.d
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#source: empty-address-2.s
#ld: -Ttext 0x0000000 -Tdata 0x200 -T empty-address-2a.t
#nm: -n
-#xfail: bfin-*-linux* frv-*-*linux* riscv64*-*-* tic54x-*-*
+#xfail: bfin-*-linux* frv-*-*linux* riscv64*-*-* tic54x-*-* [is_xcoff_format]
#...
0+0 T _start
#...
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2b.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2b.d
index 8dfe888b63d..c9b97b8b809 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2b.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-2b.d
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#source: empty-address-2.s
#ld: -Ttext 0x0000000 -Tdata 0x200 -T empty-address-2b.t
#nm: -n
-#xfail: bfin-*-linux* frv-*-*linux* riscv64*-*-* tic54x-*-*
+#xfail: bfin-*-linux* frv-*-*linux* riscv64*-*-* tic54x-*-* [is_xcoff_format]
#...
0+0 T _start
#...
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d
index b3135bf9231..fe87ebc34ac 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#source: empty-address-3.s
#ld: -T empty-address-3a.t
#nm: -n
+#xfail: [is_xcoff_format]
#...
0+0 T _start
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d
index 1e68e29b428..0d9babef6f7 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#source: empty-address-3.s
#ld: -T empty-address-3b.t
#nm: -n
+#xfail: [is_xcoff_format]
#...
0+0 T _start
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-07-28 4:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-28 4:41 ldscripts/empty-address vs. xcoff Alan Modra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).