public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
To: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Nelson Chu <nelson@rivosinc.com>,
	Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] RISC-V: Add ratified 'E' base ISA support with draft ABIs
Date: Tue,  5 Sep 2023 09:08:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1693904909.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1693452083.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>

Hi,

PATCH v1 (only Binutils):
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-July/128583.html>
PATCH v2 (Binutils+GDB):
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-August/129314.html>

Changes: v1 -> v2
-   Added GDB support

Changes: v2 -> v3
-   Rebased against the latest master
    (PATCH 1/3 related merge conflict is now resolved)


Related Project:
    PATCH 1/3: Binutils
    PATCH 2/3: Binutils
    PATCH 3/3: GDB



This patch set reflects ratified 'E' base ISAs (except version number of
'E') and draft/pre-draft RVE ABIs, ILP32E and LP64E.

RV32E / RV64E (ratified): The latest RISC-V ISA Manual
<https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/riscv-isa-release-1239329-2023-05-23>
ILP32E (draft): RISCV ABIs Specification version 1.0
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/tag/v1.0>
LP64E (pre-draft): Submission to add RVE API corresponding RV64E
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/299>

Adding pre-draft LP64E would be a problem on GCC but I bet not on Binutils
(ELF flags [to handle on Binutils/GAS] are not very detailed).


Note that this patch set does not reflect the version number of the 'E' base
ISA (ratified version 2.0) because the latest ratified specification,
"20191213", comes with the draft version 1.9 and adding the version 2.0 with
ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT does not work (due to the default value of
`DEFAULT_RISCV_ISA_SPEC'; note that it cannot be set to "draft").

I think the next unprivileged ISA specification release is the best timing
to add 'E' version 2.0 (along with new ISA_SPEC_CLASS_20??????).

Thanks,
Tsukasa




Tsukasa OI (3):
  RISC-V: Remove RV64E conflict
  RISC-V: Add "lp64e" ABI support
  RISC-V: Add RV64E support to GDB

 bfd/elfxx-riscv.c                             |  7 -----
 gas/config/tc-riscv.c                         |  4 ++-
 gas/doc/c-riscv.texi                          |  5 ++-
 .../gas/riscv/mabi-fail-rv32e-lp64d.l         |  2 +-
 .../gas/riscv/mabi-fail-rv32e-lp64f.l         |  2 +-
 .../gas/riscv/mabi-fail-rv32e-lp64q.l         |  2 +-
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-base-02.d  |  3 --
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-base-02.l  |  2 --
 gdb/arch/riscv.c                              | 15 +++++++--
 gdb/arch/riscv.h                              |  2 +-
 gdb/features/Makefile                         |  1 +
 gdb/features/riscv/rv64e-xregs.c              | 30 ++++++++++++++++++
 gdb/features/riscv/rv64e-xregs.xml            | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
 gdb/riscv-tdep.c                              |  9 +-----
 14 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-base-02.d
 delete mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/march-fail-base-02.l
 create mode 100644 gdb/features/riscv/rv64e-xregs.c
 create mode 100644 gdb/features/riscv/rv64e-xregs.xml


base-commit: d4868004365e6bc4232a1b8ebd4b328fc5bec8b1
-- 
2.42.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-25  2:26 [PATCH 0/2] " Tsukasa OI
2023-07-25  2:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Remove RV64E conflict Tsukasa OI
2023-07-25 13:27   ` Kito Cheng
2023-07-25  2:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: Add "lp64e" ABI support Tsukasa OI
2023-07-25 13:27   ` Kito Cheng
2023-08-31  3:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] RISC-V: Add ratified 'E' base ISA support with draft ABIs Tsukasa OI
2023-08-31  3:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] RISC-V: Remove RV64E conflict Tsukasa OI
2023-08-31  3:21   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] RISC-V: Add "lp64e" ABI support Tsukasa OI
2023-08-31  3:21   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] RISC-V: Add RV64E support to GDB Tsukasa OI
2023-09-05  9:08   ` Tsukasa OI [this message]
2023-09-05  9:08     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] RISC-V: Remove RV64E conflict Tsukasa OI
2023-09-05  9:08     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: Add "lp64e" ABI support Tsukasa OI
2023-09-05  9:08     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] RISC-V: Add RV64E support to GDB Tsukasa OI
2023-09-25  3:07     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] RISC-V: Add ratified 'E' base ISA support with draft ABIs Nelson Chu
2023-09-25  8:04       ` Tsukasa OI
2023-10-16  8:20         ` Tsukasa OI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1693904909.git.research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com \
    --to=research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=nelson@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).