Re: [RFC PATCH v5] RISC-V: Add support for the Zfa extension

[Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>]

On 6/30/23 07:40, Jeff Law wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/29/23 09:51, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 08:49, Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/29/23 09:37, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> So my understanding is that this needs to wait for ratification 
>>>>>>> and is
>>>>>>> not blocked by the mentioned PR.
>>>>>> Is there something special about Zfa that makes it desirable to 
>>>>>> wait for
>>>>>> ratification as opposed to standard practice of gating things as the
>>>>>> specs get to a Frozen state?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not to my knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> Waiting for ratification is probably a bad idea, there's really no way
>>>> to schedule around it.  That's a big part of the reason we've just
>>>> waited for frozen.
>>> Exactly.  ISTM that frozen is the right point to trigger.
>>
>> Is this an OK to apply the changes to trunk?
> I'll do another pass over and assuming everything looks good, I'll 
> commit it later today.  Obviously the main driver is the upcoming 2.41 
> release.  I'd rather have it in before Nick cuts the branch.
Y'all beat me to it :-)

Thanks,
jeff