public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: break gas dependency on libopcodes
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:53:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e88ee60b-ed8d-2ea0-7bb6-23a294dc6065@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOp58FuQMZ2G9=+E51R7XbZjJ1jFJPYsFQhkeK_0HXtjGg@mail.gmail.com>

On 17.11.2022 18:01, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 8:59 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 17.11.2022 17:55, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 8:53 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 17.11.2022 17:48, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 5:29 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/gas/configure.ac
>>>>>> +++ b/gas/configure.ac
>>>>>> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ changequote([,])dnl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      # Do we need the opcodes library?
>>>>>>      case ${cpu_type} in
>>>>>> -      vax | tic30)
>>>>>> +      vax | tic30 | i386)
>>>>>>         ;;
>>>>>
>>>>> This change isn't needed to move i386_seg_prefixes to gas.
>>>>
>>>> Correct, but it is needed to fulfill the purpose of the patch as per
>>>> its title. Otherwise an unused NEEDED entry remains in gas'es .dynamic.
>>>
>>> This patch should be a standalone patch.
>>
>> I'll split, but I'm nevertheless curious as to why: With it in a separate
> 
> It should be the first patch, not the last.

Of course it cannot be the last one; in my v2 series it would have been
patch 2, but now you've already committed a patch to do that move. You
don't, however, answer my question, because from my pov the configure
change now ought to become part of patch 1 (i.e. again the one removing
the last dependency). As said - I'll submit the updated series, but I
would _still_ like to have an answer to the "Why?" question. Not the
least also going forward, in case a somewhat similar change would turn
up again.

Jan

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 13:27 [PATCH 0/2] " Jan Beulich
2022-11-17 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: instantiate i386_{op,reg}tab[] in gas instead of in libopcodes Jan Beulich
2022-11-17 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: break gas dependency on libopcodes Jan Beulich
2022-11-17 16:48   ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-17 16:53     ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-17 16:55       ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-17 16:59         ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-17 17:01           ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-17 17:07             ` H.J. Lu
2022-11-18  6:53             ` Jan Beulich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e88ee60b-ed8d-2ea0-7bb6-23a294dc6065@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).