Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Remove support for non-existing 'Zve32d'

[Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>]

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:38:37 PDT (-0700), nelson@rivosinc.com wrote:
> Okay, seems it's just a typo,
> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-v-spec/commit/3af89ab16dd0ea85b15db35a2cd3c94aae5859a5
> .

Ya

Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>

>
> Thanks
> Nelson
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:19 AM Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
> wrote:
>
>> From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
>>
>> Since this "extension" does not exist (on the other hand, 'Zve64d' exists)
>> and it's not useful if we keep it (as other code portions just ignore
>> "zve32d"), this commit just removes it.
>>
>> bfd/ChangeLog:
>>
>>         * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_supported_std_z_ext): Remove 'Zve32d'
>>         extension from the list.
>> ---
>>  bfd/elfxx-riscv.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
>> index ba5165766b2b..1971e6ba6a6b 100644
>> --- a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
>> +++ b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
>> @@ -1280,7 +1280,6 @@ static struct riscv_supported_ext
>> riscv_supported_std_z_ext[] =
>>    {"zkt",              ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>    {"zve32x",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>    {"zve32f",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>> -  {"zve32d",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>    {"zve64x",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>    {"zve64f",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>    {"zve64d",           ISA_SPEC_CLASS_DRAFT,           1, 0,  0 },
>>
>> base-commit: 4b177a76d5b759ba631568fb69e8750e99b43647
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
>>