* Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
@ 2006-05-04 20:34 Steve Ellcey
2006-05-05 0:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steve Ellcey @ 2006-05-04 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgen
I have been working to move the src tree at soureware.org to a newer
version of autoconf. The reason for this is so that we can, in turn,
move to a newer version of libtool. Would it be possible to rebuild the
configure script in src/cgen with autoconf 2.59? I tried it locally and
autoconf 2.59 seemed to work with no problems, I did get a warning about
AC_ARG_PROGRAM being invoked multiple times. I removed the call to
AC_ARG_PROGRAM, reran autoconf and got the same results as when it was
there, so I think the call to AC_ARG_PROGRAM can just be removed.
Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
2006-05-04 20:34 Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory Steve Ellcey
@ 2006-05-05 0:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 0:31 ` Doug Evans
2006-05-05 17:18 ` Steve Ellcey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2006-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Ellcey; +Cc: cgen
Hi -
> I have been working to move the src tree at soureware.org to a newer
> version of autoconf. The reason for this is so that we can, in turn,
> move to a newer version of libtool. Would it be possible to rebuild the
> configure script in src/cgen with autoconf 2.59? [...]
Feel free to commit those changes. cgen is barely worthy of autoconf
anyway, being an interpreted program and all.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
2006-05-05 0:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2006-05-05 0:31 ` Doug Evans
2006-05-05 0:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 17:18 ` Steve Ellcey
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2006-05-05 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: Steve Ellcey, cgen
Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
> Hi -
>
> > I have been working to move the src tree at soureware.org to a newer
> > version of autoconf. The reason for this is so that we can, in turn,
> > move to a newer version of libtool. Would it be possible to rebuild the
> > configure script in src/cgen with autoconf 2.59? [...]
>
> Feel free to commit those changes. cgen is barely worthy of autoconf
> anyway, being an interpreted program and all.
Setting aside things like Hobbit and such.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
2006-05-05 0:31 ` Doug Evans
@ 2006-05-05 0:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 0:45 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2006-05-05 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Evans; +Cc: cgen
Hi -
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
> [...]
> > Feel free to commit those [autoconf updates]. cgen is barely
> > worthy of autoconf anyway, being an interpreted program and all.
>
> Setting aside things like Hobbit and such.
Yeah, the good old days. I remember sacrificing hobbitization at
some point; has anyone tried it lately?
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
2006-05-05 0:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2006-05-05 0:45 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2006-05-05 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: cgen
Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
> Yeah, the good old days. I remember sacrificing hobbitization at
> some point; has anyone tried it lately?
I believe the relevant sources aren't in the public cvs.
Are they still at redhat?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory
2006-05-05 0:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 0:31 ` Doug Evans
@ 2006-05-05 17:18 ` Steve Ellcey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steve Ellcey @ 2006-05-05 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fche; +Cc: cgen
> > I have been working to move the src tree at soureware.org to a newer
> > version of autoconf. The reason for this is so that we can, in turn,
> > move to a newer version of libtool. Would it be possible to rebuild the
> > configure script in src/cgen with autoconf 2.59? [...]
>
> Feel free to commit those changes. cgen is barely worthy of autoconf
> anyway, being an interpreted program and all.
>
> - FChE
OK, Here is what I commited. Let me know if there are any problems.
Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com
2006-05-05 Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
* configure.in: Remove AC_ARG_PROGRAM.
* configure: Regenerate with autoconf 2.59.
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/cgen/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -c -3 -p -r1.1.1.1 configure.in
*** configure.in 28 Jul 2000 04:11:52 -0000 1.1.1.1
--- configure.in 5 May 2006 17:06:00 -0000
*************** arch=${target_cpu}
*** 13,18 ****
AC_SUBST(arch)
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
- AC_ARG_PROGRAM
AC_OUTPUT([Makefile doc/Makefile])
--- 13,17 ----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-05 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-04 20:34 Using newer autoconf in src/cgen directory Steve Ellcey
2006-05-05 0:18 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 0:31 ` Doug Evans
2006-05-05 0:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-05-05 0:45 ` Doug Evans
2006-05-05 17:18 ` Steve Ellcey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).