Re: [patch] One more cpu-vs-prefix fix.

[Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>]

Dave Korn wrote:
>   Hiya!  I found one more place that looks to me like it should be using
> @prefix@ instead of @cpu@, since that's how all the rest of the code generates
> the "XXX_init_idesc_table" name.
>
>   I haven't tested this much yet except that it fixes a discrepancy between
> the prototype generated in the decode.h and the function call in the mloop.c
> files for the private port I'm working on.  I think that sh64 is the only
> target where there actually is any difference between @prefix@ and @cpu@ in
> practice, so I tried regenerating it and it seemed to compile ok, or at any
> rate without any missing or duplicated symbols.  I couldn't get the tests to
> run, they all fail with an error that suggests the testsuite is attempting to
> run target binaries on the host machine:
>
>   
>> spawn /sgun/tools/obj.sh64/ld/ld-new andb.cgs.o -m shelf32 -o andb.cgs.x
>>      andb.cgs.x
>> spawn andb.cgs.x
>> andb.cgs.x: andb.cgs.x: cannot execute binary file
>> FAIL: sh5 andb.cgs (execution)
>> Testing andi.cgs on machine sh5.
>>     
>
>   So whatever that is, I'd guess it's not related.  Here's a changelog entry,
> if you want the patch:
>
> cgen/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* sim-model.scm (@cpu@_prepare_run): Use @prefix@, not @cpu@.
>
>     cheers,
>       DaveK
>
>   

Thanks for the patch!

I checked it in.