* Re: cgen?
[not found] <buoacqgq3d1.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
@ 2005-02-07 17:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2005-02-07 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miles Bader; +Cc: gcc, cgen
Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
> I'm going to write GNU toolchain support (binutils/gas/gcc) for a
> new micro-controller processor arch, and I'd like to know if it's
> recommended these days to use "cgen" or not for the binutils/gas
> bits, as opposed to just rolling everything by hand. [...]
This is not very relevant to gcc, in that cgen has no (public)
gcc-related porting backend. It helps build assemblers and
simulators. It is pretty stable and has a user base (including
various Red Hat porting contracts).
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-02-07 17:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <buoacqgq3d1.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
2005-02-07 17:26 ` cgen? Frank Ch. Eigler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).