* Adding new target
@ 2012-03-29 15:04 Michael Eager
2012-03-31 20:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Eager @ 2012-03-29 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: crossgcc
Hi --
I'm trying to add a new bare-metal target architecture to CT-NG.
I'm a bit confused by what is going on. I'm building gcc-4.6.x
with Newlib.
Only the pass 2 gcc is being built, and this fails trying to
link libstdc++. I see the same when I try to build an existing
target like ARM.
The standard way to build this kind of tool chain is to build
a no-library gcc, followed by building Newlib, then build a
final C/C++ using the library.
The comments in do_cc_core_pass_1() say that it is supposed
to build a static gcc, but this does not happen if CT_BARE_METAL = y.
Can someone explain what is supposed to happen?
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Adding new target
2012-03-29 15:04 Adding new target Michael Eager
@ 2012-03-31 20:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2012-03-31 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: crossgcc; +Cc: Michael Eager
Michael, All,
On Thursday 29 March 2012 17:04:39 Michael Eager wrote:
> I'm trying to add a new bare-metal target architecture to CT-NG.
>
> I'm a bit confused by what is going on. I'm building gcc-4.6.x
> with Newlib.
>
> Only the pass 2 gcc is being built, and this fails trying to
> link libstdc++. I see the same when I try to build an existing
> target like ARM.
Can you post your changes (as a diff) and put your build.log on a website
so we can grab it?
> The standard way to build this kind of tool chain is to build
> a no-library gcc, followed by building Newlib, then build a
> final C/C++ using the library.
>
> The comments in do_cc_core_pass_1() say that it is supposed
> to build a static gcc, but this does not happen if CT_BARE_METAL = y.
In 1.14 and before, the bare-metal final compiler is built during the
core-pass-2 step, instead of the final step. This has changed in the
repository, where the correct ordering happens.
Currently, the existing bare-metal compilers are properly built (but I'm
running a build right now to check again). Please post the info listed above.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-31 20:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-29 15:04 Adding new target Michael Eager
2012-03-31 20:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).