public inbox for crossgcc@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Same toolchain for the whole system ????
@ 2013-12-30 23:25 Mau Z
  2013-12-31  5:52 ` Baruch Siach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mau Z @ 2013-12-30 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: crossgcc

Hi all,

I have a real issue with a small company named intel   :-)
Intel supplies a very powerful library called IPP.
Now the sources of IPP are not free (the sources are also not available).

So, I am doing a greate effort to build the whole system with the same
toolchain, but leave IPP alone ?!?!?!?
Am I the first one to encounter this issue ?
What is the solution ? Is there a solution ? Is there a problem ?


Thanks
Mau

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Same toolchain for the whole system ????
  2013-12-30 23:25 Same toolchain for the whole system ???? Mau Z
@ 2013-12-31  5:52 ` Baruch Siach
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baruch Siach @ 2013-12-31  5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mau Z; +Cc: crossgcc

Hi Mau,

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:25:30AM +0200, Mau Z wrote:
> I have a real issue with a small company named intel   :-)
> Intel supplies a very powerful library called IPP.
> Now the sources of IPP are not free (the sources are also not available).
>
> So, I am doing a greate effort to build the whole system with the same
> toolchain, but leave IPP alone ?!?!?!?

Since you don't have access to the sources of IPP you don't expect to build it 
yourself, do you?

> Am I the first one to encounter this issue ?
> What is the solution ? Is there a solution ? Is there a problem ?

You can either install IPP in a separate directory, and do the -I -L dance as 
described at 
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-build-ipp-application-in-linux-environment, 
or integrate IPP into something like Buidroot that gives a you clean staging 
sysroot (for libraries and headers), and a target filesystem. In case you go 
for Buidroot, you'll probably also want to package the staging directory for 
your "customers" use. Beware, though, that although the above (dated) link 
indicates that gcc is a supported compiler, the release notes 
(http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-ipp-80-library-release-notes) 
don't mention gcc at all. The product brief 
(http://software.intel.com/en-us/sites/default/files/Intel-Integrated-Performance-Primitives-v8-PB-082113.pdf) 
does mention gcc, but is short of details.

baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-31  5:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-30 23:25 Same toolchain for the whole system ???? Mau Z
2013-12-31  5:52 ` Baruch Siach

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).