public inbox for crossgcc@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pierre Saucourt-Harmel (r54698)" <pierre.saucourt-harmel@motorola.com>
To: Mahadev K Cholachagudda <kcmahadev@zilogindia.com>
Cc: crossgcc@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gcc-m68k cross compiler problem gcc2.95.2
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A5F0A02.9BFD6B54@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NEBBJIKLHKODECFJDDFGMEGNCDAA.kcmahadev@zilogindia.com>

Hello,
Mahadev K Cholachagudda wrote:
...
I think if i execute gcc to get me the final executable
file, the gcc will
intern call pre-processor, c-compiler, assembler and then linker. I
think
the linker may not be getting correct linker script or the above definitions
such as (hardware_init_hook etc) are not there in the linker script
which ld
is looking for.
Am i correct ?
Yes, you are.
Just look at the ld.info documentation (part of binutils package) to
study how the linker takes your script and which commands you can use to
write this script.
Your command line to compile should look like that (if your linker
script is named "hello.ld"):
m68k-coff-gcc -Wl,--script=hello.ld hello.c
Moreover, as your gcc compiler do not link with a default C standard
library, I think you did not generate and install correctly the newlib
package.
That's why reference to atexit, printf, _exit and _cleanup symbols
are unresolved.
Your gcc compiler should automatically (without adding any option to
the m68k-coff-gcc invocation) link your executable file with the libc.a
or libg.a.
Check the presence of these libraries under:
<your-installation-directory>/m68k-coff/lib
For __FINI_SECTION__ and __INIT_SECTION__ sections, you should have
defined them into your linker script.
For software_init_hook and harware_init_hook symbols, I don't know.
Regards,
Pierre.
 
 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Pierre Saucourt-Harmel (r54698)" <pierre.saucourt-harmel@motorola.com>
To: Mahadev K Cholachagudda <kcmahadev@zilogindia.com>
Cc: crossgcc@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gcc-m68k cross compiler problem gcc2.95.2
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A5F0A02.9BFD6B54@motorola.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20010401000000.iEOXhzN-ohJtvxE8QcoNGUopPTxSpYmgkd9DNnPFsik@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <NEBBJIKLHKODECFJDDFGMEGNCDAA.kcmahadev@zilogindia.com>

Hello,
Mahadev K Cholachagudda wrote:
...
I think if i execute gcc to get me the final executable
file, the gcc will
intern call pre-processor, c-compiler, assembler and then linker. I
think
the linker may not be getting correct linker script or the above definitions
such as (hardware_init_hook etc) are not there in the linker script
which ld
is looking for.
Am i correct ?
Yes, you are.
Just look at the ld.info documentation (part of binutils package) to
study how the linker takes your script and which commands you can use to
write this script.
Your command line to compile should look like that (if your linker
script is named "hello.ld"):
m68k-coff-gcc -Wl,--script=hello.ld hello.c
Moreover, as your gcc compiler do not link with a default C standard
library, I think you did not generate and install correctly the newlib
package.
That's why reference to atexit, printf, _exit and _cleanup symbols
are unresolved.
Your gcc compiler should automatically (without adding any option to
the m68k-coff-gcc invocation) link your executable file with the libc.a
or libg.a.
Check the presence of these libraries under:
<your-installation-directory>/m68k-coff/lib
For __FINI_SECTION__ and __INIT_SECTION__ sections, you should have
defined them into your linker script.
For software_init_hook and harware_init_hook symbols, I don't know.
Regards,
Pierre.
 
 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-12  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-11 21:46 FW: Mahadev K Cholachagudda
2001-01-11 23:09 ` mike
2001-01-12  4:04   ` gcc-m68k cross compiler problem gcc2.95.2 Mahadev K Cholachagudda
2001-01-12  5:38     ` Pierre Saucourt-Harmel (r54698) [this message]
2001-01-12 22:54       ` Mahadev K Cholachagudda
2001-04-01  0:00         ` Mahadev K Cholachagudda
2001-04-01  0:00       ` Pierre Saucourt-Harmel (r54698)
2001-04-01  0:00     ` Mahadev K Cholachagudda
2001-04-01  0:00   ` mike
2001-04-01  0:00 ` FW: Mahadev K Cholachagudda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3A5F0A02.9BFD6B54@motorola.com \
    --to=pierre.saucourt-harmel@motorola.com \
    --cc=crossgcc@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kcmahadev@zilogindia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).