Re: util-linux vs. coreutils

Re: util-linux vs. coreutils

[Eric Blake]

> > The next upstream release of coreutils will provide arch: 
> 
> (Moving to cygwin-apps, as this is an issue between maintainers.)

I would have posted here originally; see cygwin-talk for the sad
story why I didn't...

> 
> Thanks for the heads-up.  util-linux is mine; what is the timeframe?

I'm not sure when upstream will release coreutils 6.10; probably
in another month or two.  I'll send another message to this list
when it is actually is released and I'm ready to package it.

-- 
Eric Blake

Re: util-linux vs. coreutils

[Yaakov (Cygwin Ports)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Eric Blake wrote:
> The next upstream release of coreutils will provide arch: 
> http://www.nabble.com/adding-%22arch%22-%28aka-uname--m%29-to-the-coreutils-
> tf3871420.html
> 
> But this is currently provided by util-linux, so there will need to be some 
> coordination between the two packages to make the handoff smooth.

(Moving to cygwin-apps, as this is an issue between maintainers.)

Thanks for the heads-up.  util-linux is mine; what is the timeframe?


Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGZg07piWmPGlmQSMRCA96AJwL9lOBtsEYN0I5zwTRzGN5H81eTACfUQJk
394iqMlPgXlrr9GfsnSzh18=
=mtSS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----