[ITA] ruby-debug_inspector 1.1.0

[ITA] ruby-debug_inspector 1.1.0

[Daisuke Fujimura]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]

Hello,

====

Cygportfile:
- https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-debug_inspector

Packages, logs:
- https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4920404552

[-- Attachment #2: ruby-debug_inspector.cygport.diff --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 617 bytes --]

diff --git a/ruby-debug_inspector.cygport b/ruby-debug_inspector.cygport
index 33034c0..36183a5 100644
--- a/ruby-debug_inspector.cygport
+++ b/ruby-debug_inspector.cygport
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
 inherit rubygem
 
 NAME="ruby-debug_inspector"
-VERSION=0.0.3
-RELEASE=2
+VERSION=1.1.0
+RELEASE=1
 CATEGORY="Ruby"
 SUMMARY="Ruby debugging inspector wrapper"
 DESCRIPTION="A Ruby wrapper for the MRI 2.0 debug_inspector API"
 
+LICENSE="MIT"
+
 PKG_NAMES="${NAME} ${NAME}-doc"
 ruby_debug_inspector_CONTENTS="${RUBYGEM_EXTDIR#/} ${RUBYGEM_INSTDIR#/} ${RUBYGEM_SPEC#/}"
 ruby_debug_inspector_doc_CONTENTS=${RUBYGEM_DOCDIR#/}

Re: [ITA] ruby-debug_inspector 1.1.0

[Jon Turney]

On 09/05/2023 09:58, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> ====
> 
> Cygportfile:
> - https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-debug_inspector
> 
> Packages, logs:
> - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4920404552

Looks good.  I added this to your packages.

Thanks.

Re: [ITA] ruby-debug_inspector 1.1.0

[Jon Turney]

On 10/05/2023 15:24, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 09/05/2023 09:58, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> ====
>>
>> Cygportfile:
>> - 
>> https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-debug_inspector
>>
>> Packages, logs:
>> - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4920404552
> 
> Looks good.  I added this to your packages.
> 
> Thanks.

If you would like to provide a list of packages, I think it makes sense 
to save a bit of time and effort and bulk-approve many ruby-* adoptions, 
assuming that you intend to do more, and all you are doing is just 
updating the version and modernizing the cygport by adding an 
appropriate license etc.


Obviously, if there's anything you are uncertain of, or would just like 
your changes reviewed, don't hesitate to ask here.

Re: [ITA] ruby-debug_inspector 1.1.0

[Daisuke Fujimura]

> If you would like to provide a list of packages, I think it makes sense
> to save a bit of time and effort and bulk-approve many ruby-* adoptions,
> assuming that you intend to do more, and all you are doing is just
> updating the version and modernizing the cygport by adding an
> appropriate license etc.

Yes, I intend to do so, so could you please approve the `ruby-*` adoptions?

However, I would like to update these in the future only at the time
of `ruby_xy` version upgrades. (except for security related issues).

I think that this may be a low priority, since developers who want to
use the latest gems will install them via `gem install` instead of via
`setup.exe`.

> Obviously, if there's anything you are uncertain of, or would just like
> your changes reviewed, don't hesitate to ask here.

Thank you for your concern.


On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:28 PM Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2023 15:24, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On 09/05/2023 09:58, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> ====
> >>
> >> Cygportfile:
> >> -
> >> https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-debug_inspector
> >>
> >> Packages, logs:
> >> - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/4920404552
> >
> > Looks good.  I added this to your packages.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> If you would like to provide a list of packages, I think it makes sense
> to save a bit of time and effort and bulk-approve many ruby-* adoptions,
> assuming that you intend to do more, and all you are doing is just
> updating the version and modernizing the cygport by adding an
> appropriate license etc.
>
>
> Obviously, if there's anything you are uncertain of, or would just like
> your changes reviewed, don't hesitate to ask here.
>