* python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support @ 2022-05-03 20:25 Libor Ukropec 2022-05-03 22:15 ` Jon Turney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Libor Ukropec @ 2022-05-03 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-apps Hello Jon, maintainers, who is now the maintainer of the python-future - Jon Turney? The python-future supports only python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 and these are basically obsolete. I'd like to add support for 3.8 and 3.9 - it should allow me to support `duplicity` package with the latest python (3.9). PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS variable should help. Can I kindly ask someone for the package update? Thank you and regards, Libor diff --git a/python-future.cygport b/python-future.cygport index 3151b74..6f586ae 100644 --- a/python-future.cygport +++ b/python-future.cygport @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ VERSION=0.18.2 RELEASE=1 ARCH=noarch +PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS="2.7:3.6:3.7:3.8:3.9" inherit python-wheel HOMEPAGE="http://python-future.org/" @@ -20,3 +21,4 @@ src_install() { } python36_future_CONTENTS+=" usr/bin/*" +python37_future_CONTENTS+=" usr/bin/*" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support 2022-05-03 20:25 python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support Libor Ukropec @ 2022-05-03 22:15 ` Jon Turney 2022-05-04 23:04 ` Libor Ukropec 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jon Turney @ 2022-05-03 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-apps On 03/05/2022 21:25, Libor Ukropec wrote: > Hello Jon, maintainers, > > who is now the maintainer of the python-future - Jon Turney? Yes, it seems to be me, I don't know quite why though... > The python-future supports only python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 and these are > basically obsolete. I'd like to add support for 3.8 and 3.9 - it should > allow me to support `duplicity` package with the latest python (3.9). > > PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS variable should help. Can I kindly ask someone for > the package update? > > Thank you and regards, > Libor > > diff --git a/python-future.cygport b/python-future.cygport > index 3151b74..6f586ae 100644 > --- a/python-future.cygport > +++ b/python-future.cygport > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ VERSION=0.18.2 > RELEASE=1 > ARCH=noarch > > +PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS="2.7:3.6:3.7:3.8:3.9" > inherit python-wheel > > HOMEPAGE="http://python-future.org/" > @@ -20,3 +21,4 @@ src_install() { > } > > python36_future_CONTENTS+=" usr/bin/*" > +python37_future_CONTENTS+=" usr/bin/*" > Thanks. I rebuilt python-future with this change. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support 2022-05-03 22:15 ` Jon Turney @ 2022-05-04 23:04 ` Libor Ukropec 2022-05-08 12:43 ` Jon Turney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Libor Ukropec @ 2022-05-04 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-apps Dne 04.05.2022 v 0:15 Jon Turney napsal(a): > On 03/05/2022 21:25, Libor Ukropec wrote: >> Hello Jon, maintainers, >> >> who is now the maintainer of the python-future - Jon Turney? > > Yes, it seems to be me, I don't know quite why though... Hello Jon, in this case if you want to, I can take over the responsibility for this package, just let me know. > >> The python-future supports only python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 and these are >> basically obsolete. I'd like to add support for 3.8 and 3.9 - it >> should allow me to support `duplicity` package with the latest python >> (3.9). >> >> PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS variable should help. Can I kindly ask someone >>... > > Thanks. I rebuilt python-future with this change. That was quick, thank you. Unfortunately because of the dependency hell (python paramiko => nacl, and may be others) I cannot use the Python 3.9, still your work enables me to use at least the Python 3.8 (where all dependencies are resolved), which is great! Regards, Libor ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support 2022-05-04 23:04 ` Libor Ukropec @ 2022-05-08 12:43 ` Jon Turney 2022-05-08 15:25 ` Libor Ukropec 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jon Turney @ 2022-05-08 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-apps, Libor Ukropec On 05/05/2022 00:04, Libor Ukropec wrote: > Dne 04.05.2022 v 0:15 Jon Turney napsal(a): >> On 03/05/2022 21:25, Libor Ukropec wrote: >>> Hello Jon, maintainers, >>> >>> who is now the maintainer of the python-future - Jon Turney? >> >> Yes, it seems to be me, I don't know quite why though... > Hello Jon, > in this case if you want to, I can take over the responsibility for this > package, just let me know. Thanks. I've given you maintainership of python-future, although it seems pretty mature, so hopefully won't require updating. >>> The python-future supports only python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 and these are >>> basically obsolete. I'd like to add support for 3.8 and 3.9 - it >>> should allow me to support `duplicity` package with the latest python >>> (3.9). >>> >>> PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS variable should help. Can I kindly ask someone > >>... >> >> Thanks. I rebuilt python-future with this change. > That was quick, thank you. > > Unfortunately because of the dependency hell (python paramiko => nacl, > and may be others) I cannot use the Python 3.9, still your work enables > me to use at least the Python 3.8 (where all dependencies are resolved), > which is great! Yeah, the situation is not ideal, and ideally something would be done to improve this situation, perhaps so we can automatically rebuild all the python packages for 3.9 or 3.10 when we get to that, but ... SHTDI... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support 2022-05-08 12:43 ` Jon Turney @ 2022-05-08 15:25 ` Libor Ukropec 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Libor Ukropec @ 2022-05-08 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin-apps Dne 08.05.2022 v 14:43 Jon Turney napsal(a): > On 05/05/2022 00:04, Libor Ukropec wrote: >> Dne 04.05.2022 v 0:15 Jon Turney napsal(a): >>> On 03/05/2022 21:25, Libor Ukropec wrote: >>>> Hello Jon, maintainers, >>>> >>>> who is now the maintainer of the python-future - Jon Turney? >>> >>> Yes, it seems to be me, I don't know quite why though... >> Hello Jon, >> in this case if you want to, I can take over the responsibility for >> this package, just let me know. > > Thanks. I've given you maintainership of python-future, although it > seems pretty mature, so hopefully won't require updating. I am a cygwin user for ages and I'll be glad if I am able to give something back to this community. > >>>> The python-future supports only python 2.7, 3.6 and 3.7 and these >>>> are basically obsolete. I'd like to add support for 3.8 and 3.9 - it >>>> should allow me to support `duplicity` package with the latest >>>> python (3.9). >>>> >>>> PYTHON_WHEEL_VERSIONS variable should help. Can I kindly ask someone >> >>... >>> >>> Thanks. I rebuilt python-future with this change. >> That was quick, thank you. >> >> Unfortunately because of the dependency hell (python paramiko => nacl, >> and may be others) I cannot use the Python 3.9, still your work >> enables me to use at least the Python 3.8 (where all dependencies are >> resolved), which is great! > > Yeah, the situation is not ideal, and ideally something would be done to > improve this situation, perhaps so we can automatically rebuild all the > python packages for 3.9 or 3.10 when we get to that, but ... SHTDI... > Well, if this can be automated that will be cool. If not, I'm ready to help. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-08 15:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-05-03 20:25 python-future missing python 3.8 and 3.9 support Libor Ukropec 2022-05-03 22:15 ` Jon Turney 2022-05-04 23:04 ` Libor Ukropec 2022-05-08 12:43 ` Jon Turney 2022-05-08 15:25 ` Libor Ukropec
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).