public inbox for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Planned setup.ini changes for early 2018
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92b5ec62-0c4a-ad37-1c10-164db0119879@dronecode.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871sit7gji.fsf@Rainer.invalid>

On 13/01/2018 18:35, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Jon Turney writes:
>> * De-duplicate source archives
>>
>> Source archives which are identical[2] between x86 and x86_64 will be
>> moved to paths starting src/ in the release area.
> 
> You keep acting like using a new src/ hierarchy was already decided
> upon, yet I don't remember it even getting discussed.  So, can we have
> that discussion before decision, please?

The purpose of my original email is to start that discussion.

> To repeat, I think a separate src/ hierarchy would be a mistake, given
> where we are today, although it has a certain appeal from a greenfield
> perspective.  But more to the point, there is nothing special about
> source archives (except that they're not architecture specific) that
> warrants putting them into their own hierarchy, IMHO.  If they are going
> to get moved on deduplication (there are good reasons to move them and
> these likely outweight the benefits of just deleting them in one side of
> the hierarchy), we already have a place for that and that place is
> noarch/.  That keeps everything in working order for folks who for
> whatever reason mirror the repository, even if the only mirror one
> architecture.
If I've understood correctly, your objection is that this will break 
installing source packages from mirrors which choose to mirror selected 
subdirectories (e.g. x86_64/ and noarch/).

I guess I consider that counterbalanced by the ability to selectively 
not mirror src/.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-15 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10 22:44 Jon Turney
2018-01-10 23:27 ` David Stacey
2018-01-13 17:21   ` Jon Turney
2018-01-11 17:55 ` Peter A. Castro
2018-01-12 15:48   ` Jon Turney
2018-01-12 18:13     ` Peter A. Castro
2018-01-13 17:22       ` Jon Turney
2018-01-11 18:30 ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-13 18:43   ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-13 18:35 ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-15 19:02   ` Jon Turney [this message]
2018-01-16 18:12     ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-22 23:13 ` Jon Turney
2018-01-23 18:30   ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-24 20:30     ` Jon Turney
2018-01-24 20:57       ` Achim Gratz
2018-01-28 15:07   ` Jon Turney
2018-03-01 16:01 ` Jon Turney
2018-03-01 16:39   ` Marco Atzeri
2018-03-01 17:02     ` Jon Turney
2019-05-30 14:08   ` Jon Turney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92b5ec62-0c4a-ad37-1c10-164db0119879@dronecode.org.uk \
    --to=jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk \
    --cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).