public inbox for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee <ler762@gmail.com>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Cc: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: [ITP] openh264 (2.3.1)
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 17:40:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD8GWsv7xW22gUVatQ4Y_MezA0VnPKfFBFMoLOgwyEpzOKYxDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61e8a80b73a2d431afa338bd274dac17c5c87e25.camel@cygwin.com>

On 2/6/23, Yaakov Selkowitz via Cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-02-05 at 22:11 -0700, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2023-02-05 19:44, Yaakov Selkowitz via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2023-02-05 at 17:37 +0900, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> > > I would like to propose new package openh264, which is
>> > > a H264 video codec library. This is needed by ffmpeg
>> > > package I had proposed, and also provided for ffmpeg-free
>> > > package in fedora.
>> > >
>> > > I already prepared the package at the following location.
>> > >
>> > > https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/openh264/
>>
>> > Unfortunately, this cannot be included in the Cygwin distribution.
>> > Cisco's
>> > patent license only covers binaries they distribute.  Fedora has a
>> > special
>> > arrangement with Cisco where they build their RPMs on Fedora
>> > infrastructure,
>> > but the packages are hosted by Cisco in a separate repository.
>>
>> http://www.openh264.org/
>> "Cisco has taken their H.264 implementation, and open sourced it under BSD
>>
>> license terms. Development and maintenance will be overseen by a board
>> from
>> industry and the open source community. Furthermore, we have provided a
>> binary
>> form suitable for inclusion in applications across a number of different
>> operating systems, and make this binary module available for download
>> from
>> the
>> Internet. We will not pass on our MPEG-LA licensing costs for this
>> module,
>> and
>> based on the current licensing environment, this will effectively make
>> H.264
>> free for use on supported platforms."
>
> This is exactly the point.  Cisco paid for a license, but that license is
> limited to binaries they distribute.

IANAL but it sure looks like redistribution is allowed:

cisco/openh264 is licensed under the
BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License

  https://github.com/cisco/openh264/blob/master/LICENSE
    <.. snip ..>
  Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification,
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

Lee

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-06 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-05  8:37 Takashi Yano
2023-02-05 16:36 ` Jon Turney
2023-02-06 12:22   ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-06  2:44 ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2023-02-06  5:11   ` Brian Inglis
2023-02-06  5:16     ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2023-02-06  5:25       ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-09 12:02         ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-10  4:35         ` Yaakov Selkowitz
2023-02-10  5:05           ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-10  5:18             ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-10  5:25               ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-13 18:30                 ` Jon Turney
2023-02-13 19:03                   ` Brian Inglis
2023-02-14  9:11                     ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-14 11:02                       ` ASSI
2023-02-14 12:28                         ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-14 16:41                           ` ASSI
2023-02-14 21:21                             ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-16 19:24                               ` Jon Turney
2023-02-17  8:49                                 ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-19 15:37                                   ` Jon Turney
2023-02-20  8:55                                     ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-21 14:11                                       ` Jon Turney
2023-02-22  3:33                                         ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-23 12:54                                           ` Jon Turney
2023-02-24  9:16                                             ` Takashi Yano
2023-02-06 22:40       ` Lee [this message]
2023-02-07  5:19       ` Brian Inglis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAD8GWsv7xW22gUVatQ4Y_MezA0VnPKfFBFMoLOgwyEpzOKYxDA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ler762@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
    --cc=yselkowitz@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).