[ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
package which is currently orphanded. I have already
prepared the updated package at:

https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Thomas Wolff]

Am 20.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps:
> I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
> package which is currently orphanded. I have already
> prepared the updated package at:
>
> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
>
The archive appears to be empty.

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:45 +0100
Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 20.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps:
> > I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
> > package which is currently orphanded. I have already
> > prepared the updated package at:
> >
> > https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> >
> The archive appears to be empty.

This was originally empty.
https://www.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Jon Turney]

On 20/01/2023 15:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:45 +0100
> Thomas Wolff wrote:
>> Am 20.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps:
>>> I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
>>> package which is currently orphanded. I have already
>>> prepared the updated package at:
>>>
>>> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
>>>
>> The archive appears to be empty.
> 
> This was originally empty.
> https://www.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

This is a historical packaging mistake (or dates back to when we had to 
have an install package with the same name as the source package).

Please drop that install package, and make it obsoleted by libsndfile1, 
instead.

Otherwise, looks good.

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:21:23 +0000
Jon Turney wrote:
> On 20/01/2023 15:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:45 +0100
> > Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >> Am 20.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps:
> >>> I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
> >>> package which is currently orphanded. I have already
> >>> prepared the updated package at:
> >>>
> >>> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> >>>
> >> The archive appears to be empty.
> > 
> > This was originally empty.
> > https://www.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> 
> This is a historical packaging mistake (or dates back to when we had to 
> have an install package with the same name as the source package).
> 
> Please drop that install package, and make it obsoleted by libsndfile1, 
> instead.

Thanks for checking.

Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
or vice versa?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Brian Inglis]

On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:21:23 +0000
> Jon Turney wrote:
>> On 20/01/2023 15:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:00:45 +0100
>>> Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>>> Am 20.01.2023 um 11:34 schrieb Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps:
>>>>> I would like to take over the maintenance of libsndfile
>>>>> package which is currently orphanded. I have already
>>>>> prepared the updated package at:
>>>>> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

>>>> The archive appears to be empty.

>>> This was originally empty.
>>> https://www.cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

>> This is a historical packaging mistake (or dates back to when we had to
>> have an install package with the same name as the source package).
>> Please drop that install package, and make it obsoleted by libsndfile1,
>> instead.

> Thanks for checking.
> Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
> or vice versa?

Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no longer required 
by packaging tools and add:

	libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by packaging tools

in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis			Calgary, Alberta, Canada

La perfection est atteinte			Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter	not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retirer	but when there is no more to cut
			-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:40:18 -0700
Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
> > or vice versa?
> 
> Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no longer required 
> by packaging tools and add:
> 
> 	libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by packaging tools
> 
> in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.

Thanks for the advice!

I have updated the package in:
https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Jon Turney]

On 21/01/2023 00:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:40:18 -0700
> Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>>> Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
>>> or vice versa?
>>
>> Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no longer required
>> by packaging tools and add:
>>
>> 	libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by packaging tools
>>
>> in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.
> 
> Thanks for the advice!

This is correct.

> I have updated the package in:
> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/

Thanks.

I've given you the adopted packages: libsndfile, mpg123, opus, 
opus-tools, opusfile, SDL2.  I'll look at the rest later.

I note most of these sources also have mingw-cross packages as well. I 
don't know what we want to do about those.

[GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Jon Turney]

On 21/01/2023 14:59, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 21/01/2023 00:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:40:18 -0700
>> Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>>>> Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
>>>> or vice versa?
>>>
>>> Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no 
>>> longer required
>>> by packaging tools and add:
>>>
>>>     libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by 
>>> packaging tools
>>>
>>> in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.
>>
>> Thanks for the advice!
> 
> This is correct.
> 
>> I have updated the package in:
>> https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I've given you the adopted packages: libsndfile, mpg123, opus, 
> opus-tools, opusfile, SDL2.  I'll look at the rest later.

Please accept these literally priceless gold stars for adopting these 
packages.

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:59:17 +0000
Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:

> On 21/01/2023 00:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:40:18 -0700
> > Brian Inglis wrote:
> >> On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >>> Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
> >>> or vice versa?
> >>
> >> Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no longer required
> >> by packaging tools and add:
> >>
> >> 	libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by packaging tools
> >>
> >> in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.
> > 
> > Thanks for the advice!
> 
> This is correct.
> 
> > I have updated the package in:
> > https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I've given you the adopted packages: libsndfile, mpg123, opus, 
> opus-tools, opusfile, SDL2.  I'll look at the rest later.

Thanks in advance.

> I note most of these sources also have mingw-cross packages as well. I 
> don't know what we want to do about those.

I noticed that. However, my main motivation is porting MOC
to cygwin, so I wanted the needed packages up to date.
Therefore, I did not touch these mingw packages.

Does anyone want these mingw packages updated?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Re: [GOLDSTAR] Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Andrew Schulman]

> > I've given you the adopted packages: libsndfile, mpg123, opus, 
> > opus-tools, opusfile, SDL2.  I'll look at the rest later.
> 
> Please accept these literally priceless gold stars for adopting these 
> packages.

Awarded! https://cygwin.com/goldstars/#TY

Re: [ITA] libsndfile (1.2.0)

[Takashi Yano]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1472 bytes --]

On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 21:15:15 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:59:17 +0000
> Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On 21/01/2023 00:20, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:40:18 -0700
> > > Brian Inglis wrote:
> > >> On 2023-01-20 16:22, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > >>> Do you mean, keep libsndfile1 and delete libsndfile,
> > >>> or vice versa?
> > >>
> > >> Presumably means to remove libsndfile from PKG_NAMES as it is no longer required
> > >> by packaging tools and add:
> > >>
> > >> 	libsndfile1_OBSOLETES=libsndfile # no longer required by packaging tools
> > >>
> > >> in libsndfile1 package stanza lines in libsndfile.cygport.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the advice!
> > 
> > This is correct.
> > 
> > > I have updated the package in:
> > > https://tyan0.yr32.net/cygwin/x86_64/release/libsndfile/
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > I've given you the adopted packages: libsndfile, mpg123, opus, 
> > opus-tools, opusfile, SDL2.  I'll look at the rest later.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> > I note most of these sources also have mingw-cross packages as well. I 
> > don't know what we want to do about those.
> 
> I noticed that. However, my main motivation is porting MOC
> to cygwin, so I wanted the needed packages up to date.
> Therefore, I did not touch these mingw packages.
> 
> Does anyone want these mingw packages updated?

Fix license string.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

[-- Attachment #2: libsndfile.cygport --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]

NAME="libsndfile"
VERSION=1.2.0
RELEASE=1
LICENSE="LGPL-2.1-only"
CATEGORY="Libs"
SUMMARY="Sampled audio data library"
DESCRIPTION="libsndfile is a library of C routines for reading and writing
files containing sampled audio data."
HOMEPAGE="https://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/"
SRC_URI="https://github.com/libsndfile/libsndfile/releases/download/${VERSION}/${NAME}-${VERSION}.tar.xz"
PATCH_URI="1.0.23-oss.patch"

PKG_NAMES="${NAME}1 ${NAME}-devel ${NAME}-utils"
libsndfile1_CONTENTS='usr/bin/*-1.dll usr/share/doc/'
libsndfile1_OBSOLETES="libsndfile" # no longer required by packaging tools
libsndfile_devel_CONTENTS='usr/include/ usr/lib/'
libsndfile_utils_CATEGORY="Audio"
libsndfile_utils_SUMMARY="${SUMMARY% *} utilities"
libsndfile_utils_CONTENTS='usr/bin/*.exe usr/share/man/man1/'

ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I M4"
CYGCONF_ARGS="
	--disable-alsa
	--enable-sqlite
	--disable-gcc-pipe
	--disable-gcc-werror
"
MAKEOPTS+=" htmldocdir=/usr/share/doc/${NAME}/html"

BUILD_REQUIRES="flac-devel libogg-devel libmp3lame-devel libmpg123-devel libmpg123-devel libvorbis-devel"