Re: calm/mksetupini changes

[Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>]

On 24/05/2022 11:05, Lemures Lemniscati wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 19:37:43 +0100, Jon Turney
>> On 23/05/2022 14:09, Lemures Lemniscati wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 May 2022 21:31:46 +0100, Jon Turney
>>>> Eventually, this should eliminate packages in the deprecated so report [1] with a rdepends count of zero.  To reduce the rdpepends count to zero, packages which depend on a deprecated soversion need to be rebuilt for a newer soversion.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://cygwin.com/packages/reports/deprecated_so.html
>>>
>>> Although libiconv2 is contained in the list above,
>>> I don't think it is deprecated.
>>
>> Haha.  I think this is just a bug, and the code which generates that report is getting confused by the test: status of libiconv2.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing that out.  I'll look into fixing it when I can.
> 
> All right. And yet another small point...
> 
> I've uploaded libiconv 1.17-1 tagged with 'test',
> but their statuses are 'stable' in the page of its src package:
> https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-src.html ,
> while the ones of generated libiconv packages are 'test':
> e.g. https://www.cygwin.com/packages/summary/libiconv-devel.html .
> 
> I was confused a bit by the situation :).

Yes, this was the other half of this bug, a regression in cygport where 
the test: label wasn't correctly added to srcpkg hints.

I'll fix this data and add a consistency check to calm.