public inbox for cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Libor Ukropec <ace@seznam.cz>
To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: How does a package become orphaned? (was Re: Attn maintainer: python-paramiko)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:07:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f526f553-6fd4-0801-460f-6ec4fb753611@seznam.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b12ad01-36a6-da87-6cf8-bd925cde749e@gmail.com>

Dne 02.12.2022 v 9:20 Marco Atzeri napsal(a):
> On 01.12.2022 21:18, Libor Ukropec wrote:
>> Dne 01.12.2022 v 20:41 Jon Turney napsal(a):
>>> On 17/11/2022 10:24, Libor Ukropec wrote:
>>>> Dne 16.11.2022 v 12:52 Thomas Wolff napsal(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>> What I do not want to do is the violent take over, so I gave some time to the 
>>>>>> original owner of the python-paramiko to respond. I created a bug on  github.com 
>>>>>> almost 2 weeks ago and so far no reaction: 
>>>>>> https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/1
>>>>> As a general comment, I'd like to point out that "almost 2 weeks" is even less than 
>>>>> someone's holiday time may be...
>>>>
>>>> See above in the thread - author did not react here on cygwin for months. What I did, 
>>>> I've found the author on GitHub and contacted him there as well.
>>>>
>>>>  >>Jon Turney: It's undefined how many times we should ping, or how long we should 
>>>> wait for a response, but I think that the ~10 months that's elapsed here is more than 
>>>> enough!
>>>
>>> Yeah, 10 months is not 2 weeks.
>>>
>>> Libor, I've given you maintainer-ship of python-paramiko.
>>
>> Jon,
>>
>> I did not ask for it officially yet (quite busy and had issues with duplicity that 
>> depends on the paramiko itself, so I intentionally waited if something happens).
>>
>>  >
>>  > If that's not what the desired outcome here, please let me know.
>>
>> I wanted that.
>>
>>>
>>> Sorry for taking so long over this.
>>>
>>> I guess somebody should ping Michael Wild to ask about the rest of his packages.
>> I already did that 29 days ago, no response yet
>> https://github.com/wildmichael/cygwin/issues/1
>>
>> The paramiko depends on python-bcrypt and python-nacl so I'd like to ask for their 
>> ownership too, otherwise the ownership for paramiko does not make sense.
>>
>> If Michael Wild by any chance responds and still would like to maintain those packages, 
>> I'll be happy to return them :)
>>
> 
> you can ITA  python-nacl
> 
> there is little to do for python-bcrypt as newer versions require rust and we have no 
> compiler for it.

Yes, I learned that 3.2.0 is the last we can support in Cygwin.
I didn't notice that bcrypt is also for Python 3.9 (becuase nacl wasn't and all was in 
paramiko repository). In this case, I'm unblocked.

Regards,
Libor

> 
> 
> Regards
> Marco
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-23 22:17 Attn maintainer: python-paramiko Marco Atzeri
2022-01-27  4:18 ` Marco Atzeri
2022-11-02 20:04   ` Libor Ukropec
2022-11-04 12:34     ` How does a package become orphaned? (was Re: Attn maintainer: python-paramiko) Jon Turney
2022-11-04 13:05       ` Chad Dougherty
2022-11-15 18:47         ` Libor Ukropec
2022-11-16 11:52           ` Thomas Wolff
2022-11-17 10:24             ` Libor Ukropec
2022-11-17 18:32               ` Brian Inglis
2022-12-01 19:41               ` Jon Turney
2022-12-01 20:18                 ` Libor Ukropec
2022-12-02  8:20                   ` Marco Atzeri
2022-12-05 23:07                     ` Libor Ukropec [this message]
2022-12-05 20:54                   ` Jon Turney
2022-12-06  0:07                     ` Libor Ukropec
2022-12-01 19:41         ` Jon Turney
2022-12-01 20:02           ` Achim Gratz
2023-05-09 20:16           ` Trusted maintainers (was: Re: How does a package become orphaned? (was Re: Attn maintainer: python-paramiko)) Jon Turney
2023-05-11 13:57             ` Andrew Schulman
2023-05-13 10:18               ` Marco Atzeri
2023-05-30 13:39                 ` Andrew Schulman
2023-06-06  8:12                 ` Corinna Vinschen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f526f553-6fd4-0801-460f-6ec4fb753611@seznam.cz \
    --to=ace@seznam.cz \
    --cc=cygwin-apps@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).