fish curr and prev are reversed

fish curr and prev are reversed

[Andrew Schulman]

RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.

AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?

Thanks,
Andrew

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Achim Gratz]

Andrew Schulman <schulman.andrew@...> writes:
> AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
> so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?

Just add the curr: and prev: lines to setup.hint and upload that new file
(for both the main package and the debuginfo directory).


Regards,
Achim.

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]

On May 31 04:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
> opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.
> 
> AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
> so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?

I added

  prev: 2.3.0-1
  curr: 2.3b1-1

to all setup.hint files.


HTH,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 655 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

On May 31 04:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
> opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.
> 
> AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
> so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?

Did you see the calm warning?  For some reason the 64 bit version is
missing debuginfo packages later than 2.2.0-3.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Achim Gratz]

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@...> writes:
> I added
> 
>   prev: 2.3.0-1
>   curr: 2.3b1-1
> 
> to all setup.hint files.

That's what calm already does (it sees 2.3b1 like 2.3.1, IIRC).  Andrew
wanted the beta version (2.3b1) to be previous to the release (2.3.0).


Regards,
Achim.

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 627 bytes --]

On May 31 10:46, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@...> writes:
> > I added
> > 
> >   prev: 2.3.0-1
> >   curr: 2.3b1-1
> > 
> > to all setup.hint files.
> 
> That's what calm already does (it sees 2.3b1 like 2.3.1, IIRC).  Andrew
> wanted the beta version (2.3b1) to be previous to the release (2.3.0).

My reading skills... sigh.  I fixed that on sware (the fish-debuginfo
problem on 64 bit still persists of course).


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Jon Turney]

On 31/05/2016 09:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
> opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.
>
> AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
> so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?

The sort order is now documented at [1]

See also the discussion at 
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2015-10/msg00003.html

[1] https://cygwin.com/setup.html#naming

-- 
Jon TURNEY
Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Jon Turney]

On 31/05/2016 10:54, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 31 04:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
>> opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.
>>
>> AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
>> so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?
>
> Did you see the calm warning?  For some reason the 64 bit version is
> missing debuginfo packages later than 2.2.0-3.

Unfortunately, because this is an error in the state of the release 
area, and not with an upload, calm isn't smart enough to known which 
package maintainer to tell about this.

> ERROR: package 'fish-debuginfo' stability 'curr' selects non-existent version '2.3b1-1'
> ERROR: package 'fish-debuginfo' stability 'prev' selects non-existent version '2.3.0-1'
> ERROR: existing x86_64 package set has errors

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Andrew Schulman]

> On May 31 10:46, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@...> writes:
> > > I added
> > > 
> > >   prev: 2.3.0-1
> > >   curr: 2.3b1-1
> > > 
> > > to all setup.hint files.
> > 
> > That's what calm already does (it sees 2.3b1 like 2.3.1, IIRC).  Andrew
> > wanted the beta version (2.3b1) to be previous to the release (2.3.0).
> 
> My reading skills... sigh.  I fixed that on sware (the fish-debuginfo
> problem on 64 bit still persists of course).

All correct, thank you. Not sure what happened with fish-debuginfo, but I'll
reupload it.

Andrew

Re: fish curr and prev are reversed

[Andrew Schulman]

> On 31/05/2016 09:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > RIght now for fish, version 2.3b1-1 is current and 2.3.0-1 is prev. This is the
> > opposite of what I intended.  I expected 2.3b1 to sort before 2.3.0.
> >
> > AFAIK the last setup.hint that I uploaded didn't include curr: or prev: lines,
> > so this looks to be what calm decided to do.  Can someone please fix it?
> 
> The sort order is now documented at [1]
> 
> See also the discussion at 
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2015-10/msg00003.html
> 
> [1] https://cygwin.com/setup.html#naming

Thanks. Although it gives the wrong answer (meaning, not the answer I want) in
this case, I think it's reasonable.  Next time I'll check and add curr: and
prev: lines if needed.  Andrew