Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Apr 21 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:14:49AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >Yes, you can email these to me, if you want, if when we standardize on 
> >Modular X11:  cgf+cygwin-apps AT cgf DOT com
> 
> Sigh.  Why am I always smarter two seconds after hitting 'y'?

- You got 2 seconds older and wiser.

- Since behaviourism is right.  Thinking is just a reaction to body
  function (in this case "typing").

- The flying spaghetti monster has mislead your fingers to give
  you a sign.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 21 11:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:14:49AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >Yes, you can email these to me, if you want, if when we standardize on 
>> >Modular X11:  cgf+cygwin-apps AT cgf DOT com
>> 
>> Sigh.  Why am I always smarter two seconds after hitting 'y'?
>
>- You got 2 seconds older and wiser.
>
>- Since behaviourism is right.  Thinking is just a reaction to body
>  function (in this case "typing").
>
>- The flying spaghetti monster has mislead your fingers to give
>  you a sign.

I was also thrown by the fact that Andre didn't single me out and mention
that no personal offense was intended by his request.  So, I was still
reeling with shock when I typed in the response.

cgf

RE: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Igor Peshansky]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

> So you're saying you had the same premonition I did?!?  Yikes!  What are
> the odds that two totally separate people on totally separate continents
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Huh?  Since when are Chicago and New York on two separate continents?
Now, granted, parts of New York may well be (the Bronx, for example,
though that's more likely a separate planet altogether), but in general
we're both in good old North America...

> would think the same thing at the same time like that?  Must be
> astronomical, unless you believe in the paranormal and we're both able
> to see into the future or something.  Man oh man, now *that's* creepy!

Indeed. :-)
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

RE: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Gary R. Van Sickle]

> From: Igor Peshansky
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 8:01 AM
> To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List
> Subject: RE: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)
> 
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
> 
> > On 19 April 2006 03:20, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >
> > [ bock-bock-b'gaaawk, Gary.  You know the drill! ]
> >
> > >> From: Christopher Faylor
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:17 PM
> > >> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.SPLAT
> > >> Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Hannu E K 
> Nevalainen wrote:
> > >>> Sorry for writing in a shorthand style. Please fill in 
> the missing 
> > >>> words of type "please"... And as a precaution; in case 
> CGF happens 
> > >>> to read this and finds anything upsetting:
> > >>> "No personal offense intended!" ;-) Remember; I would 
> NOT be here 
> > >>> writing this unless I lkied cygwin a lot.
> > >>
> > >> You'd be much better served if you just made points without this 
> > >> creepy
> > >> (paranoid?) need to drag me into a discussion.
> > >>
> > >> cgf
> > >
> > > How did I know he'd take offense at your clarification that there 
> > > was indeed "no personal offense intended", Hannu?
> 
> You know, the moment I saw Hannu's message, I was about to 
> shoot off a quick one to CGF with something like "Don't 
> worry, it's just the Gary syndrome"...  But then I thought: 
> "Nah, Gary wouldn't..."  Apparently, he would.  :-)
> 	Igor

So you're saying you had the same premonition I did?!?  Yikes!  What are the
odds that two totally separate people on totally separate continents would
think the same thing at the same time like that?  Must be astronomical,
unless you believe in the paranormal and we're both able to see into the
future or something.  Man oh man, now *that's* creepy!

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 

Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:00:53AM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>You know, the moment I saw Hannu's message, I was about to shoot off a
>quick one to CGF with something like "Don't worry, it's just the Gary
>syndrome"...  But then I thought: "Nah, Gary wouldn't..."  Apparently,
>he would.  :-)

Heh.  I wish you'd done that, Igor.  It probably would have given me
some perspective.

Right now I'm sitting here struggling with my stupid router trying to
find out why it won't reliably deliver email after I accidentally
unplugged it (I obviously made a change that I didn't save to EEPROM).
The last thing I really need is dealing with ad hominem content in an
otherwise civilized technical discussion.

cgf

RE: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Igor Peshansky]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 19 April 2006 03:20, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> [ bock-bock-b'gaaawk, Gary.  You know the drill! ]
>
> >> From: Christopher Faylor
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:17 PM
> >> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.SPLAT
> >> Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> >>> Sorry for writing in a shorthand style. Please fill in the missing words
> >>> of type "please"... And as a precaution;
> >>> in case CGF happens to read this and finds anything upsetting:
> >>> "No personal offense intended!" ;-)
> >>> Remember; I would NOT be here writing this unless I lkied cygwin a lot.
> >>
> >> You'd be much better served if you just made points without
> >> this creepy
> >> (paranoid?) need to drag me into a discussion.
> >>
> >> cgf
> >
> > How did I know he'd take offense at your clarification that there was
> > indeed "no personal offense intended", Hannu?

You know, the moment I saw Hannu's message, I was about to shoot off a
quick one to CGF with something like "Don't worry, it's just the Gary
syndrome"...  But then I thought: "Nah, Gary wouldn't..."  Apparently,
he would.  :-)
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

RE: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

[Dave Korn]

On 19 April 2006 03:20, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

[ bock-bock-b'gaaawk, Gary.  You know the drill! ]

>> From: Christopher Faylor
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:17 PM
>> To: cygwin-apps@cygwin.SPLAT
>> Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
>>> Sorry for writing in a shorthand style. Please fill in the missing words
>>> of type "please"... And as a precaution;
>>> in case CGF happens to read this and finds anything upsetting:
>>> "No personal offense intended!" ;-)
>>> Remember; I would NOT be here writing this unless I lkied cygwin a lot.
>> 
>> You'd be much better served if you just made points without
>> this creepy
>> (paranoid?) need to drag me into a discussion.
>> 
>> cgf
> 
> How did I know he'd take offense at your clarification that there was indeed
> "no personal offense intended", Hannu?


  Have you stopped beating your wife, Gary?


  :-P~~~~

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....