Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

[Shankar Unni]

Shaffer, Kenneth wrote:

> [...] a mounting issue when upgrading from a very old cygwin, b20 I think, 

Whoa! bzzzt! bzzzt! "cygwin b20" reference!

We need to institute a "lead star" (or pick your base metal) for anyone 
who attempts to (seriously) introduce b20 into the conversation...

Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

[Igor Peshansky]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Shankar Unni wrote:

> Shaffer, Kenneth wrote:
>
> > [...] a mounting issue when upgrading from a very old cygwin, b20 I think,
>
> Whoa! bzzzt! bzzzt! "cygwin b20" reference!
>
> We need to institute a "lead star" (or pick your base metal) for anyone
> who attempts to (seriously) introduce b20 into the conversation...

A concrete star -- the Cygwin variant of concrete shoes...
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:30:22PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Shankar Unni wrote:
>>Shaffer, Kenneth wrote:
>>>[...] a mounting issue when upgrading from a very old cygwin, b20 I
>>>think,
>>
>>Whoa! bzzzt! bzzzt! "cygwin b20" reference!
>>
>>We need to institute a "lead star" (or pick your base metal) for anyone
>>who attempts to (seriously) introduce b20 into the conversation...
>
>A concrete star -- the Cygwin variant of concrete shoes...

How about just a "black hole" instead of a "gold star"?

cgf

Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

[Igor Peshansky]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:30:22PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> >On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Shankar Unni wrote:
> >>Shaffer, Kenneth wrote:
> >>>[...] a mounting issue when upgrading from a very old cygwin, b20 I
> >>>think,
> >>
> >>Whoa! bzzzt! bzzzt! "cygwin b20" reference!
> >>
> >>We need to institute a "lead star" (or pick your base metal) for anyone
> >>who attempts to (seriously) introduce b20 into the conversation...
> >
> >A concrete star -- the Cygwin variant of concrete shoes...
>
> How about just a "black hole" instead of a "gold star"?

Ooh, boy, when you said B20 will take over the world, you *really* meant
it.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

Re: How to run a cygwin command from the window scheduler

[Christopher Faylor]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:47:54PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:30:22PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>> >On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Shankar Unni wrote:
>> >>Shaffer, Kenneth wrote:
>> >>>[...] a mounting issue when upgrading from a very old cygwin, b20 I
>> >>>think,
>> >>
>> >>Whoa! bzzzt! bzzzt! "cygwin b20" reference!
>> >>
>> >>We need to institute a "lead star" (or pick your base metal) for anyone
>> >>who attempts to (seriously) introduce b20 into the conversation...
>> >
>> >A concrete star -- the Cygwin variant of concrete shoes...
>>
>> How about just a "black hole" instead of a "gold star"?
>
>Ooh, boy, when you said B20 will take over the world, you *really* meant
>it.

Yes, but not in a good way, obviously.

cgf