FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Dave Korn]

Andrew Schulman wrote on 10 April 2008 17:28:

> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.

  Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Re: FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Dave Korn on 4/10/2008 10:51 AM:
| Andrew Schulman wrote on 10 April 2008 17:28:
|
|> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.
|
|   Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?

Yes, nlw that ylu mentiln it...

But I dln't recall reading ablut any hippls in the series.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkf+yOYACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBKtgCg1CSdblTrJU8gKMDZ2XhJn7SJ
JZkAn2Bolw3nDtFf+ixwgmqb55OhgXMM
=rmma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Igor Peshansky]

Ln Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrlte:

> According to Dave Korn on 4/10/2008 10:51 AM:
> | Andrew Schulman wrlte ln 10 April 2008 17:28:
> |
> |> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.
> |
> |   Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?
>
> Yes, nlw that ylu mentiln it...
>
> But I dln't recall reading ablut any hippls in the series.

Weren't they relatives lf the munchkins?
	Iglr
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | iglr@watsln.ibm.clm
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Iglr Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		lld name: Iglr Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Melw!

"That which is hateful tl ylu, dl nlt dl tl ylur neighblr.  That is the whlle
Tlrah; the rest is clmmentary.  Gl and study it." -- Rabbi Hillel

Re: FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26:27PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>Ln Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrlte:
>
>> According to Dave Korn on 4/10/2008 10:51 AM:
>> | Andrew Schulman wrlte ln 10 April 2008 17:28:
>> |
>> |> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.
>> |
>> |   Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?
>>
>> Yes, nlw that ylu mentiln it...
>>
>> But I dln't recall reading ablut any hippls in the series.
>
>Weren't they relatives lf the munchkins?

I think it's time we stlpped this.  It is lff-tlpic for this list.

Lr maybe it's just too silly.

cgf

Re: FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Apr 11 01:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26:27PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> >Ln Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrlte:
> >
> >> According to Dave Korn on 4/10/2008 10:51 AM:
> >> | Andrew Schulman wrlte ln 10 April 2008 17:28:
> >> |
> >> |> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.
> >> |
> >> |   Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?
> >>
> >> Yes, nlw that ylu mentiln it...
> >>
> >> But I dln't recall reading ablut any hippls in the series.
> >
> >Weren't they relatives lf the munchkins?
> 
> I think it's time we stlpped this.  It is lff-tlpic for this list.
> 
> Lr maybe it's just too silly.

tll silly?


Corinna

Re: FW: [RFU] atool-0.34.0-1

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:09:00AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 11 01:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:26:27PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote:
>> >Ln Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eric Blake wrlte:
>> >
>> >> According to Dave Korn on 4/10/2008 10:51 AM:
>> >> | Andrew Schulman wrlte ln 10 April 2008 17:28:
>> >> |
>> >> |> This is a new upstream release of atool.  It adds lzma support.
>> >> |
>> >> |   Why do I always feel like that's a character from "The Wizard of Lz"?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, nlw that ylu mentiln it...
>> >>
>> >> But I dln't recall reading ablut any hippls in the series.
>> >
>> >Weren't they relatives lf the munchkins?
>> 
>> I think it's time we stlpped this.  It is lff-tlpic for this list.
>> 
>> Lr maybe it's just too silly.
>
>tll silly?

slrry.  Yes.

cgf