public inbox for cygwin-xfree@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Schmidt <oschmidt-mailinglists@gmx.de>
To: cygwin-xfree <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: AltGr key mostly fires an additional CONTROL key
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E65CF75.8050304@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E64D020.7000201@dronecode.org.uk>

Hi Jon,

On 9/5/2011 3:35 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> comments, as what this code is trying to do is slightly obscure, and I
> assume that the old comments about TweakUI being the cause of this are
> just wrong (as you don't mention that you have it installed)

Yes I didn't test it with Tweak UI and I ignored the comments on Tweak
UI. I also think that the old "sleep(0)" workaround for Tweak UI is now
not necessary with the new patch. But I kept the changes as minimal as
possible and tried to keep existing code as much as it is.

>> diff --git a/hw/xwin/winkeybd.c b/hw/xwin/winkeybd.c
>> +  static Bool   hasLastControlL = FALSE;
>> +  static UINT   lastMessage;
>> +  static WPARAM lastWparam;
>> +  static LPARAM lastLparam;
>> +  static LONG   lastTime;
> 
> I was going to suggest using static  MSG lastMsg, but then I noticed
> that lastWparam, lastLparam are completely unused...

yes, they are now unused editing relicts from my testing phase...

>> +
>> +          if ((lastMessage == WM_KEYDOWN || lastMessage ==
>> WM_SYSKEYDOWN)
>> +              && lastTime == lTime)
> 
> Why is it necessary to check that the last message was WM_(SYS)KEYDOWN
> here? hasLastControlL can't get set unless it was?

yes you are right: the if condition here is a little over-determined ;-)


>> diff --git a/hw/xwin/winwndproc.c b/hw/xwin/winwndproc.c
>> +      /* Discard fake Ctrl_L presses that precede AltGR on non-US
>> keyboards */
>> +      if (winIsFakeCtrl_L (message, wParam, lParam))
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> -      /* Discard fake Ctrl_L presses that precede AltGR on non-US
>> keyboards */
>> -      if (winIsFakeCtrl_L (message, wParam, lParam))
>> -    return 0;
>> -
> 
> Can you say why it's necessary to change the order here and why this is
> the correct ordering?  A comment here might be a good idea :-)

in the old coding there is this check for generated Windows auto-repeat
key events and this check can cause the function to exit:

      /*
       * Discard presses generated from Windows auto-repeat
       */
      if (lParam & (1<<30))
      {
        switch (wParam)
        {
          /* ago: Pressing LControl while RControl is pressed is
           * Indicated as repeat. Fix this!
           */
          case VK_CONTROL:
          case VK_SHIFT:
            if (winCheckKeyPressed(wParam, lParam))
              return 0;
            break;
          default:
            return 0;
        }
      }

I didn't change this coding and I'm not sure what the funtion
winCheckKeyPressed exactly does. However the check winIsFakeCtrl_L must
be done before leaving the function because of auto-repeated key events.
Otherwise there will be problems with autorepeated AltGr-Keys. These
must also be tracked with winIsFakeCtrl_L otherwise autorepeated AltGr
keys could produce a "hanging" Control_L key (I had this effect when I
tested the patch).

So the order has to be changed, because the function winIsFakeCtrl_L now
has an internal state due to it's static variables and this state has to
be synchronized with the actuel key events.

Best regards,
Oliver

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/


  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15 12:53 Oliver Schmidt
2011-08-15 17:14 ` AW: " Paul Maier
2011-08-15 17:37   ` Oliver Schmidt
2011-09-05 13:35 ` Jon TURNEY
2011-09-06  7:45   ` Oliver Schmidt [this message]
2011-10-13 12:42     ` Jon TURNEY
     [not found] <006301cc4fb3$2696d060$73c47120$@de>
2011-08-01 14:57 ` Jon TURNEY

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E65CF75.8050304@gmx.de \
    --to=oschmidt-mailinglists@gmx.de \
    --cc=cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).