* [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 @ 2012-09-05 4:19 Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-05 14:49 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-05 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin Hi, I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. For a while I had been interested in the Amanda package, but hadn't had the time to look into it. I recently had reason to investigate it further so decided to look at making a version available for cygwin. Here are some of my efforts to get a full version (server & client) of Amanda running on cygwin. Version of amanda for cygwin. Available for gentoo: http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-backup/amanda Available for debian: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amanda-server The version 3.3.2 is the latest stable version. sdesc: "AMANDA Network Backup program" ldesc: "AMANDA, the Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver, is a backup solution that allows the IT administrator to set up a single master backup server to back up multiple hosts over network to tape drives/changers or disks or optical media. Amanda uses native utilities and formats (e.g. dump and/or GNU tar) and can back up a large number of servers and workstations running multiple versions of Linux or Unix. Amanda uses a native Windows client to back up Microsoft Windows desktops and servers." category: Backup requires: bash bzip2 gzip xz tar perl libffi4 libgcc1 libglib2.0_0 libiconv2 libint18 libncursesw10 libpcre1 libreadline7 libssp0 cygwin wget \ http://my-cygwin-amanda.googlecode.com/files/setup.hint \ http://my-cygwin-amanda.googlecode.com/files/amanda-3.3.2-4.tar.bz2 \ http://my-cygwin-amanda.googlecode.com/files/amanda-3.3.2-4-src.tar.bz2 NOTE: The current version of tar (1.25) available from cygwin is broken and doesn't work for amanda :-( I've created a patch for the 1.26 version of tar to create a working amanda installation on my machine. Not sure how to get the current maintainer to update the official version to 1.26. The packages is currently setup as server and client together. I haven't tried splitting it into parts like debian does. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 2012-09-05 4:19 [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-05 14:49 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin) 2012-09-06 12:41 ` Mark O'Keefe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Larry Hall (Cygwin) @ 2012-09-05 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote: > Hi, > > I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear > that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>: cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If you are maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages that is distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be subscribed to this list. > NOTE: The current version of tar (1.25) available from cygwin is broken > and doesn't work for amanda :-( I've created a patch for the 1.26 > version of tar to create a working amanda installation on my machine. > Not sure how to get the current maintainer to update the official version > to 1.26. If it's a general problem with tar, you'll want to contact the upstream maintainer. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 2012-09-05 14:49 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin) @ 2012-09-06 12:41 ` Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-06 19:27 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-06 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 06/09/2012, at 12:03 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear >> that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. > > From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>: > > cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If you are maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages that is distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be subscribed to this list. From <http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting> Submitting a new package: So you've got a package you want to submit. Follow the following checklist before emailing the cygwin-apps mailing list and you'll almost certainly save time. Propose on the cygwin-apps mailing list that you are interested in becoming a package maintainer for package "foo" using a subject like "[ITP] foo 0.10". Some packages cannot be distributed via Cygwin's setup due to vendor licence limitations. Other packages may not be appropriate for Cygwin. This step will save time if, for some reason, we cannot accept the package. So, you might appreciate why I was confused thinking that I should email the cygwin-apps list. I read (later) that it was a subscriber-only list and emailed to this list instead. I'm guessing that there might need to be some updates to the website to reflect the correct process. If there is a more up-to-date set of instructions on how to contribute to Cygwin, please re-direct me. I've used cygwin for years and thought I should take the opportunity to give back to the community if I can. > > >> NOTE: The current version of tar (1.25) available from cygwin is broken >> and doesn't work for amanda :-( I've created a patch for the 1.26 >> version of tar to create a working amanda installation on my machine. >> Not sure how to get the current maintainer to update the official version >> to 1.26. > > If it's a general problem with tar, you'll want to contact the upstream > maintainer. > It is a problem with tar version 1.25 which is the current cygwin version. The fix is in version 1.26. Just need to re-package 1.26 for cygwin. Refer to: <http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/FAQ:What_versions_of_GNU_Tar_are_Amanda-compatible%3F> > -- > Larry > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > A: Yes. > > Q: Are you sure? > >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 2012-09-06 12:41 ` Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-06 19:27 ` Christopher Faylor 2012-09-06 21:27 ` Mark O'Keefe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2012-09-06 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:58:25PM +1000, Mark O'Keefe wrote: > >On 06/09/2012, at 12:03 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >> On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear >>> that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. >> >> From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>: >> >>cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues >>regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If >>you are maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages >>that is distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be >>subscribed to this list. > From <http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting> > >Submitting a new package: >So you've got a package you want to submit. Follow the following >checklist before emailing the cygwin-apps mailing list and you'll >almost certainly save time. > >Propose on the cygwin-apps mailing list that you are interested in >becoming a package maintainer for package "foo" using a subject like >"[ITP] foo 0.10". Some packages cannot be distributed via Cygwin's >setup due to vendor licence limitations. Other packages may not be >appropriate for Cygwin. This step will save time if, for some reason, >we cannot accept the package. > >So, you might appreciate why I was confused thinking that I should >email the cygwin-apps list. I read (later) that it was a >subscriber-only list and emailed to this list instead. I'm guessing >that there might need to be some updates to the website to reflect the >correct process. I'm not sure what your confusion is but both of the above tell you to send intent-to-package announcements to cygwin-apps. One says "propose on the cygwin-apps mailing list". The other says for "maintaining or *volunteering to maintain*". cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 2012-09-06 19:27 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2012-09-06 21:27 ` Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-07 0:02 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-06 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On 07/09/2012, at 5:12 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:58:25PM +1000, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >> >> On 06/09/2012, at 12:03 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >> >>> On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear >>>> that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. >>> >>> From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>: >>> >>> cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues >>> regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If >>> you are maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages >>> that is distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be >>> subscribed to this list. >> >> From <http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting> >> >> Submitting a new package: >> So you've got a package you want to submit. Follow the following >> checklist before emailing the cygwin-apps mailing list and you'll >> almost certainly save time. >> >> Propose on the cygwin-apps mailing list that you are interested in >> becoming a package maintainer for package "foo" using a subject like >> "[ITP] foo 0.10". Some packages cannot be distributed via Cygwin's >> setup due to vendor licence limitations. Other packages may not be >> appropriate for Cygwin. This step will save time if, for some reason, >> we cannot accept the package. >> >> So, you might appreciate why I was confused thinking that I should >> email the cygwin-apps list. I read (later) that it was a >> subscriber-only list and emailed to this list instead. I'm guessing >> that there might need to be some updates to the website to reflect the >> correct process. > > I'm not sure what your confusion is but both of the above tell you to > send intent-to-package announcements to cygwin-apps. One says "propose > on the cygwin-apps mailing list". The other says for "maintaining or > *volunteering to maintain*". I posted to that list and got zip. No messages got through. No response from the list owner. So the confusion was that it says to post there, but I was not able to do so. I was subscribed to the list and getting messages others sent to it. Message through now - thanks to Marco for being helpful. > > cgf > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 2012-09-06 21:27 ` Mark O'Keefe @ 2012-09-07 0:02 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2012-09-07 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:34:02AM +1000, Mark O'Keefe wrote: > >On 07/09/2012, at 5:12 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:58:25PM +1000, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >>> >>> On 06/09/2012, at 12:03 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/5/2012 12:19 AM, Mark O'Keefe wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I had tried posting this to the cygwin-apps list, but it would appear >>>>> that maybe I can't do that. So I'll post it hear for comment. >>>> >>>> From <http://cygwin.com/lists.html>: >>>> >>>> cygwin-apps: a subscriber-only list for discussing packaging issues >>>> regarding applications that are distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If >>>> you are maintaining or volunteering to maintain one of the packages >>>> that is distributed with the Cygwin net releases you should be >>>> subscribed to this list. >>> >>> From <http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting> >>> >>> Submitting a new package: >>> So you've got a package you want to submit. Follow the following >>> checklist before emailing the cygwin-apps mailing list and you'll >>> almost certainly save time. >>> >>> Propose on the cygwin-apps mailing list that you are interested in >>> becoming a package maintainer for package "foo" using a subject like >>> "[ITP] foo 0.10". Some packages cannot be distributed via Cygwin's >>> setup due to vendor licence limitations. Other packages may not be >>> appropriate for Cygwin. This step will save time if, for some reason, >>> we cannot accept the package. >>> >>> So, you might appreciate why I was confused thinking that I should >>> email the cygwin-apps list. I read (later) that it was a >>> subscriber-only list and emailed to this list instead. I'm guessing >>> that there might need to be some updates to the website to reflect the >>> correct process. >> >> I'm not sure what your confusion is but both of the above tell you to >> send intent-to-package announcements to cygwin-apps. One says "propose >> on the cygwin-apps mailing list". The other says for "maintaining or >> *volunteering to maintain*". > >I posted to that list and got zip. No messages got through. No response >from the list owner. So the confusion was that it says to post there, but I was >not able to do so. I was subscribed to the list and getting messages others >sent to it. Yeah, saw your complaint to cygwin-apps. Your professed inability to send email to cygwin-apps does not imply "there might need to be some updates to the website to reflect the correct process". Anyway, now that you are sending email to the right place, lets close this thread. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-06 21:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-09-05 4:19 [ITP] amanda 3.3.2 Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-05 14:49 ` Larry Hall (Cygwin) 2012-09-06 12:41 ` Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-06 19:27 ` Christopher Faylor 2012-09-06 21:27 ` Mark O'Keefe 2012-09-07 0:02 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).