public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Looking for explanation
       [not found] <d23e7aeb-1600-cb72-28d6-f0a758d91ff6.ref@bellsouth.net>
@ 2020-07-17 16:16 ` Robert McBroom
  2020-07-17 16:27   ` Eliot Moss
  2020-07-17 19:59   ` Marco Atzeri
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert McBroom @ 2020-07-17 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't remember 
being introduced.  I see s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where 
would I look for an explanation?

Robert McBroom



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Looking for explanation
  2020-07-17 16:16 ` Looking for explanation Robert McBroom
@ 2020-07-17 16:27   ` Eliot Moss
  2020-07-17 22:33     ` Robert McBroom
  2020-07-17 19:59   ` Marco Atzeri
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eliot Moss @ 2020-07-17 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 7/17/2020 12:16 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
 > Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't remember being introduced.  I see
 > s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where would I look for an explanation?

Dear Robert:

s and t are usual from Posix and Cygwin tries to come as close to Posix as it can under Windows.  s 
is for setuid/setgid and t is the "sticky" bit.  The + indicates that there
are more refined access modes present.

You might want to read up on ls, chmod, getfacl, etc.

What _can_ get funky and confusing is the mapping from Windows ACLs to what Cygwin
reports and Cygwin's manipulation of ACLs.  There is online Cygwin documentation about that as well.

None of this is new.  Maybe something changed the file permissions, and now they show up this way 
for you?  Not sure what your real question is ...

Best wishes - Eliot Moss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Looking for explanation
  2020-07-17 16:16 ` Looking for explanation Robert McBroom
  2020-07-17 16:27   ` Eliot Moss
@ 2020-07-17 19:59   ` Marco Atzeri
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marco Atzeri @ 2020-07-17 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 17.07.2020 18:16, Robert McBroom wrote:
> Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't remember 
> being introduced.  I see s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where 
> would I look for an explanation?
> 
> Robert McBroom
> 
> 

info ls

see ‘--format=long’ point at page

    10.1.2 What information is listed

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Looking for explanation
  2020-07-17 16:27   ` Eliot Moss
@ 2020-07-17 22:33     ` Robert McBroom
  2020-07-17 22:52       ` Bob McGowan
  2020-07-17 22:59       ` Eliot Moss
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert McBroom @ 2020-07-17 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 7/17/20 12:27 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 7/17/2020 12:16 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
> > Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't 
> remember being introduced.?? I see
> > s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where would I look for an 
> explanation?
>
> Dear Robert:
>
> s and t are usual from Posix and Cygwin tries to come as close to 
> Posix as it can under Windows.?? s is for setuid/setgid and t is the 
> "sticky" bit.?? The + indicates that there
> are more refined access modes present.
>
> You might want to read up on ls, chmod, getfacl, etc.
>
> What _can_ get funky and confusing is the mapping from Windows ACLs to 
> what Cygwin
> reports and Cygwin's manipulation of ACLs.?? There is online Cygwin 
> documentation about that as well.
>
> None of this is new.?? Maybe something changed the file permissions, 
> and now they show up this way for you??? Not sure what your real 
> question is ...
>
UNIX use predates posix. Don't see any of these designations on Fedora 
even on ntfs file systems. Haven't dived into them because my objective 
is to run scientific calculations, but curiosity got the better of me.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Looking for explanation
  2020-07-17 22:33     ` Robert McBroom
@ 2020-07-17 22:52       ` Bob McGowan
  2020-07-17 22:59       ` Eliot Moss
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bob McGowan @ 2020-07-17 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

On 7/17/20 3:33 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
> On 7/17/20 12:27 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> On 7/17/2020 12:16 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
>> > Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't 
>> remember being introduced.?? I see
>> > s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where would I look for an 
>> explanation?
>>
>> Dear Robert:
>>
>> s and t are usual from Posix and Cygwin tries to come as close to 
>> Posix as it can under Windows.?? s is for setuid/setgid and t is the 
>> "sticky" bit.?? The + indicates that there
>> are more refined access modes present.
>>
>> You might want to read up on ls, chmod, getfacl, etc.
>>
>> What _can_ get funky and confusing is the mapping from Windows ACLs to 
>> what Cygwin
>> reports and Cygwin's manipulation of ACLs.?? There is online Cygwin 
>> documentation about that as well.
>>
>> None of this is new.?? Maybe something changed the file permissions, 
>> and now they show up this way for you??? Not sure what your real 
>> question is ...
>>
> UNIX use predates posix. Don't see any of these designations on Fedora 
> even on ntfs file systems. Haven't dived into them because my objective 
> is to run scientific calculations, but curiosity got the better of me.
> 
> -- 
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Actually, the 's' and 't' designators predate POSIX.

I have an old Bell Laboratories "UNIX programmer's manual", copyright 
1983, 1979 (for UNIX 7th Edition), and it mentions both the 's' and 't' 
in the 'ls' man page.

Bob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Looking for explanation
  2020-07-17 22:33     ` Robert McBroom
  2020-07-17 22:52       ` Bob McGowan
@ 2020-07-17 22:59       ` Eliot Moss
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eliot Moss @ 2020-07-17 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert McBroom; +Cc: cygwin

Those bits are all there onFedora as well. They’re pretty standard output from “ls -l”, for example. I suppose I could say that I am mystified that you’re mystified:-) ... but this is something that does go beyond the most casual command line use ...

Regards — EM

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 17, 2020, at 6:33 PM, Robert McBroom <mcforum@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> 
> On 7/17/20 12:27 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
>> On 7/17/2020 12:16 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
>> > Directory listing shows a number of new features that I don't remember being introduced.?? I see
>> > s,t,+ etc. other than the expected wxr. Where would I look for an explanation?
>> 
>> Dear Robert:
>> 
>> s and t are usual from Posix and Cygwin tries to come as close to Posix as it can under Windows.?? s is for setuid/setgid and t is the "sticky" bit.?? The + indicates that there
>> are more refined access modes present.
>> 
>> You might want to read up on ls, chmod, getfacl, etc.
>> 
>> What _can_ get funky and confusing is the mapping from Windows ACLs to what Cygwin
>> reports and Cygwin's manipulation of ACLs.?? There is online Cygwin documentation about that as well.
>> 
>> None of this is new.?? Maybe something changed the file permissions, and now they show up this way for you??? Not sure what your real question is ...
>> 
> UNIX use predates posix. Don't see any of these designations on Fedora even on ntfs file systems. Haven't dived into them because my objective is to run scientific calculations, but curiosity got the better of me.
> 
> --
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-17 22:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <d23e7aeb-1600-cb72-28d6-f0a758d91ff6.ref@bellsouth.net>
2020-07-17 16:16 ` Looking for explanation Robert McBroom
2020-07-17 16:27   ` Eliot Moss
2020-07-17 22:33     ` Robert McBroom
2020-07-17 22:52       ` Bob McGowan
2020-07-17 22:59       ` Eliot Moss
2020-07-17 19:59   ` Marco Atzeri

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).