* Latest setup.exe not code-signed?
@ 2016-12-15 1:59 Kal Sze
2016-12-15 10:11 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-12-15 13:35 ` Andrey Repin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kal Sze @ 2016-12-15 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hello,
It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Cheers,
Kal
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?
2016-12-15 1:59 Latest setup.exe not code-signed? Kal Sze
@ 2016-12-15 10:11 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-12-15 13:35 ` Andrey Repin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ismail Donmez @ 2016-12-15 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze <swordangel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
It was never code signed and the reasons for this has been discussed
before. You can search the list for the reasons.
Regards,
ismail
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?
2016-12-15 1:59 Latest setup.exe not code-signed? Kal Sze
2016-12-15 10:11 ` Ismail Donmez
@ 2016-12-15 13:35 ` Andrey Repin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Repin @ 2016-12-15 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kal Sze, cygwin
Greetings, Kal Sze!
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed.
No.
> Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Been like that all the time.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, December 15, 2016 11:56:57
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-15 13:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-15 1:59 Latest setup.exe not code-signed? Kal Sze
2016-12-15 10:11 ` Ismail Donmez
2016-12-15 13:35 ` Andrey Repin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).