* xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency @ 2017-06-20 22:52 Bryan Dongray 2017-06-21 8:22 ` Thomas Dickey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bryan Dongray @ 2017-06-20 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On an upgrade of xterm from 327-1 to 329-1 starting an xterm now complains: $ xterm /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1" /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" When I downgrade to 327-1 these messages do not show, so I assume the latest version requires specific fonts. I installed all the X11 fonts which were described as "core font" (surprisingly a reinstall of "xinit" did not install these), but still I get the above messages. However I assume xterm falls back on some other font, as everything displays ok (as far as I checked). Q1. Can someone point me at which font I need to install to not get these warnings (I tried a few, but no luck, and there are hundreds to try)? Q2. Shouldn't these fonts be a dependency of xterm? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency 2017-06-20 22:52 xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency Bryan Dongray @ 2017-06-21 8:22 ` Thomas Dickey 2017-06-26 8:19 ` Bryan Dongray 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Dickey @ 2017-06-21 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bryan Dongray; +Cc: cygwin ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Bryan Dongray" <cygwin@dongrays.com> | To: cygwin@cygwin.com | Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:52:38 PM | Subject: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency | | On an upgrade of xterm from 327-1 to 329-1 starting an xterm now | complains: | $ xterm | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1" | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font | "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" | | When I downgrade to 327-1 these messages do not show, so I assume the | latest version requires specific fonts. | | I installed all the X11 fonts which were described as "core font" | (surprisingly a reinstall of "xinit" did not install these), | but still I get the above messages. However I assume xterm falls back | on | some other font, as everything displays ok (as far as I checked). | | Q1. Can someone point me at which font I need to install to not get | these | warnings (I tried a few, but no luck, and there are hundreds to | try)? | | Q2. Shouldn't these fonts be a dependency of xterm? see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219800 -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency 2017-06-21 8:22 ` Thomas Dickey @ 2017-06-26 8:19 ` Bryan Dongray 2017-06-27 2:44 ` Thomas Dickey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Bryan Dongray @ 2017-06-26 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Dickey, cygwin On 06/21/2017 01:22 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Bryan Dongray" <cygwin@dongrays.com> > | To: cygwin@cygwin.com > | Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:52:38 PM > | Subject: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency > | > | On an upgrade of xterm from 327-1 to 329-1 starting an xterm now > | complains: > | $ xterm > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1" > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > | "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > | > | When I downgrade to 327-1 these messages do not show, so I assume the > | latest version requires specific fonts. > | > | I installed all the X11 fonts which were described as "core font" > | (surprisingly a reinstall of "xinit" did not install these), > | but still I get the above messages. However I assume xterm falls back > | on > | some other font, as everything displays ok (as far as I checked). > | > | Q1. Can someone point me at which font I need to install to not get > | these > | warnings (I tried a few, but no luck, and there are hundreds to > | try)? > | > | Q2. Shouldn't these fonts be a dependency of xterm? > > see > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219800 Thank you for replying but I'm unsure how that discussion answers my question? It is related, but looks like they are talking about the width of bold fonts causing an issue with zsh and vim (and others), not about xterm complaining about missing fonts when it starts up. My issue is not about bold fonts causing an issue, maybe they do. I get complaints when starting xterm that it needs a font(s). So what font package do I need to install to stop these complaints? However, maybe I missed it (in the above bugs freebsd org discussion) on which font I need to install, because there is so much discussion about zsh, vim, bold widths, etc. So if anyone can point out the comment there which tells me that, that'd be great, or just tell me directly the name of the font package I need to download - thanks. I guess I could be super-lazy and install EVERY font, but that sounds like just a brute force solution, and I might miss it anyway since not all fonts seems to have the word "font" in the package name. But suppose I do install the font is needed, this leads onto my second question that surely required fonts for xterm should be set as dependencies for xterm. Yes? So is that something that should be in the cygwin setup configuration? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency 2017-06-26 8:19 ` Bryan Dongray @ 2017-06-27 2:44 ` Thomas Dickey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Dickey @ 2017-06-27 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bryan Dongray; +Cc: Thomas Dickey, cygwin [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2234 bytes --] On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:18:52AM -0700, Bryan Dongray wrote: > On 06/21/2017 01:22 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > | From: "Bryan Dongray" <cygwin@dongrays.com> > > | To: cygwin@cygwin.com > > | Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:52:38 PM > > | Subject: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency > > | > > | On an upgrade of xterm from 327-1 to 329-1 starting an xterm now > > | complains: > > | $ xterm > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1" > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > > | > > | When I downgrade to 327-1 these messages do not show, so I assume the > > | latest version requires specific fonts. no - there's no new font requirements. xterm has (for a long time) provided a way to infer what bold font would correspond to the normal fonts if there's no bold-font resource setting. One of the changes in #328 omitted a step in that process, making it fail to see that a bold font was specified. The warnings have been there for a few years. You simply got extra warnings due to the bug. As far as I know, #330 fixes that issue. > > | > > | I installed all the X11 fonts which were described as "core font" > > | (surprisingly a reinstall of "xinit" did not install these), > > | but still I get the above messages. However I assume xterm falls back > > | on > > | some other font, as everything displays ok (as far as I checked). > > | > > | Q1. Can someone point me at which font I need to install to not get > > | these > > | warnings (I tried a few, but no luck, and there are hundreds to > > | try)? > > | > > | Q2. Shouldn't these fonts be a dependency of xterm? Some packagers don't think so. The ones that are used by default are the xorg "misc" fonts (though I don't recall what the package name in cygwin is -- package names for X fonts differ in every system that I've seen). -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-27 2:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-06-20 22:52 xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency Bryan Dongray 2017-06-21 8:22 ` Thomas Dickey 2017-06-26 8:19 ` Bryan Dongray 2017-06-27 2:44 ` Thomas Dickey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).