RE: GCC *builds* now... but no install

RE: GCC *builds* now... but no install

[Schumacher, Gordon]

# From: Christopher Faylor [ mailto:cgf@redhat.com ]
# Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:07 AM
# To: cygwin@cygwin.com
# Subject: Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install
# 
# Just as a wild guess it would sound like you have an old 
# version of setup.exe.

Well... the "setup.exe" on the download site doesn't work at all - it claims
that there are no packages to install.  The "osetup.exe" displays version
numbers but no package names.

I'm running Windows 2000 SP2 with 320MB RAM...

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:35:42PM -0600, Schumacher, Gordon wrote:
># From: Christopher Faylor [ mailto:cgf@redhat.com ]
># Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:07 AM
># To: cygwin@cygwin.com
># Subject: Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install
># 
># Just as a wild guess it would sound like you have an old 
># version of setup.exe.
>
>Well... the "setup.exe" on the download site doesn't work at all - it claims
>that there are no packages to install.  The "osetup.exe" displays version
>numbers but no package names.

Another wild guess -- the mailing list archives would probably be very
instructive on the "nothing to install" scenario.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: GCC *builds* now... but no install

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:00:56AM -0600, Schumacher, Gordon wrote:
>Okay, so I found the problems I was having getting GCC built - the Cygnus
>installer seems to be a bit confused (I mirrored the installation, and when
>I ran the installer it installed lots of different versions of things, and
>it can't install bzip'ed files.)

Just as a wild guess it would sound like you have an old version of setup.exe.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

GCC *builds* now... but no install

[Schumacher, Gordon]

Okay, so I found the problems I was having getting GCC built - the Cygnus
installer seems to be a bit confused (I mirrored the installation, and when
I ran the installer it installed lots of different versions of things, and
it can't install bzip'ed files.)

Anyway, so I got that cleared up.  Now GCC 3.0 compiles just fine, but when
I do a "make install" I get the following:

   make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/MCOGoSchum/gccobj/gcc'
   make[1]: Entering directory `/home/MCOGoSchum/gccobj/fastjar'
   make[2]: Entering directory `/home/MCOGoSchum/gccobj/fastjar'
   /bin/sh ../../gcc-3.0/fastjar/mkinstalldirs /usr/local/bin
     /bin/sh /home/MCOGoSchum/gcc-3.0/install-sh -c  jar /usr/local/bin/jar
   cp: `jar' and `/usr/local/bin/#inst.912#' are the same file
   make[2]: *** [install-binPROGRAMS] Error 1
   make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/MCOGoSchum/gccobj/fastjar'
   make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2
   make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/MCOGoSchum/gccobj/fastjar'
   make: *** [install-fastjar] Error 2

This happens whether I do a straight "configure" or "configure
--prefix=/usr" to match GCC's current install location.

Any ideas on this one?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/