Re: RFP: NASM

Re: RFP: NASM

[Lapo Luchini]

> *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
> hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)

I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility (cvs.exe,
cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of course withour sources) so
they indeed know of cygwin existence, but of course they didn't suppose that
being an "official package" was so easy... I think the best think is to
contact them to ask if they want to mantain NASM package themself and
moreover politely pointing out that they should point to the setup instead
of having a tarball with some utilities packaged...
who volunteers? 0=)

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: RFP: NASM

[Lapo Luchini]

> > utilities packaged... who volunteers? 0=)
> I think you just did :}.

Uh, I didn't realize it.. but your experience in dealing with people far
exceedes my own so you must be right.
I'll do it.

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: RFP: NASM

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:lapo@lapo.it] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:01 PM
> To: CygWin
> Subject: Re: RFP: NASM
> 
> 
> > *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with 
> cygwin without a 
> > hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
> 
> I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility 
> (cvs.exe, cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of 
> course withour sources) so they indeed know of cygwin 
> existence, but of course they didn't suppose that being an 
> "official package" was so easy... I think the best think is 
> to contact them to ask if they want to mantain NASM package 
> themself and moreover politely pointing out that they should 
> point to the setup instead of having a tarball with some 
> utilities packaged... who volunteers? 0=)

I think you just did :}.

ROb

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/