Libtool version 2.4.2 ?

Libtool version 2.4.2 ?

[marco atzeri]

starting to see programs with

configure.ac:16: error: Libtool version 2.4.2 or higher is required
m4/libtool.m4:48: LT_PREREQ is expanded from...

any chanche to move on ?

On the related libtool annaunce, some time ago:

--------------------------------------
This release contains bugfixes accumulated over the last 13 months since
the release of 2.4 in September 2010.

New in 2.4.2 2011-10-17:
--------------------------------------

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Libtool version 2.4.2 ?

[Charles Wilson]

On 11/17/2013 1:31 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
> starting to see programs with
>
> configure.ac:16: error: Libtool version 2.4.2 or higher is required
> m4/libtool.m4:48: LT_PREREQ is expanded from...
>
> any chanche to move on ?
>
> On the related libtool annaunce, some time ago:

Now that (a) inetutils is out, and (b) all of the automakes and 
autoconfs are updated, (c) libtool is next on my 
to-be-updated/64bit-ified list.  This includes running the test suite (a 
10-15 hour effort), and investigating/fixing the regressions.  So it is 
not a quick task.

However, I still have the ongoing issues with run/run2 to track down first.

--
Chuck


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Libtool version 2.4.2 ?

[marco atzeri]

Il 11/18/2013 4:25 PM, Charles Wilson ha scritto:
> On 11/17/2013 1:31 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> starting to see programs with
>>
>> configure.ac:16: error: Libtool version 2.4.2 or higher is required
>> m4/libtool.m4:48: LT_PREREQ is expanded from...
>>
>> any chanche to move on ?
>>
>> On the related libtool annaunce, some time ago:
>
> Now that (a) inetutils is out, and (b) all of the automakes and
> autoconfs are updated, (c) libtool is next on my
> to-be-updated/64bit-ified list.  This includes running the test suite (a
> 10-15 hour effort), and investigating/fixing the regressions.  So it is
> not a quick task.
>
> However, I still have the ongoing issues with run/run2 to track down first.
>
> --
> Chuck
>

thanks Chuck

It is not urgent for me as patching that source to
require "2.4 or higher" worked fine
;-)

just to be ready for the future
Regards
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Libtool version 2.4.2 ?

[Peter Rosin]

On 2013-11-18 16:25, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 11/17/2013 1:31 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> starting to see programs with
>>
>> configure.ac:16: error: Libtool version 2.4.2 or higher is required
>> m4/libtool.m4:48: LT_PREREQ is expanded from...
>>
>> any chanche to move on ?
>>
>> On the related libtool annaunce, some time ago:
> 
> Now that (a) inetutils is out, and (b) all of the automakes and
> autoconfs are updated, (c) libtool is next on my
> to-be-updated/64bit-ified list. This includes running the test suite
> (a 10-15 hour effort), and investigating/fixing the regressions. So
> it is not a quick task.

According to my notes there was only one (unexpected) failure,
namely in with-pic.at, line 40. The failure was only a testsuite
issue though and I later silenced it with commit d674eaa44
'tests: skip with-pic test when no "real" pic flag is used.'

Cheers,
Peter


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple